IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Lion/Snow Leaopard side-by-side on an IPv6 enabled ADSL2+ home line..

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 05 August 2011 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF3221F8B00 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.282, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJxhME1JznBG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og120.obsmtp.com (exprod7og120.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826EC21F8AFE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob120.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTjvu+gZVps7T6X+GLH+dl2LIzvGegk0L@postini.com; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:24:12 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DE31B8162 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B3319005D; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:23:57 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-2@u-1.phicoh.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Lion/Snow Leaopard side-by-side on an IPv6 enabled ADSL2+ home line..
Thread-Index: AQHMU0dHRVa7aNWwW0q26rsswqWBjZUOtKQA
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:23:57 +0000
Message-ID: <B3C69AB1-70A6-4D98-9AB4-85ADC98FD04A@nominum.com>
References: <0D324E27-DB0C-4496-9E3D-EF01CEC2778E@apnic.net> <D9712407-8D6D-49BC-B642-AD4DAD8E9CAB@apple.com> <m1QoM9f-0001eQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <AA1FC05C-EFA4-46C9-B626-1D558DD6B844@apple.com> <1716B088-C4DF-414C-A8EB-8B778B7D89BC@nominum.com> <99FAF4A2-CD86-4F5E-9D0B-1D6E2DACD459@gmail.com> <m1QoX5D-0001gCC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <124FB632-ECED-4EFA-9102-BB9AB8C88096@gmail.com> <20110804012903.D8797126C146@drugs.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr3bT6KWG+3YqHKWUsYBxZNj_ypwhd01ucgsU00Oz_XEeA@mail.gmail.com> <20110804024701.E9DD5126C85A@drugs.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr15PEJcS32t8B_ps=VeO-nKJZKtRgtYidrkwv9zafLL1A@mail.gmail.com> <20110804033606.19231126CE1C@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20110804043805.EE880126D30C@drugs.dv.is> <c.org@apple.com> <CA+OBy1Mjpar6rSF2OCRJ6Mnsy4NMtNknMY_27CzUQRNzv56Vyw@mail.gmail.com> <B533E4F2-AC6E-4874-A99D-3E0C4B42CA62@apnic.net> <CA+OBy1P-eGv+-cwbezxTV9orH9LH5VXqJqUPs+jgszG1S0EvWg@mail.gmail.com> <47CBE645-71EE-48E6-9E3B-384E2C9BE821@apnic.net> <4E699@apple.com> <87805FCBB- A7A9-43A@apple.com> <78E0CEA6-3E21-42ED-9704-64383CF9B83F@apple.com> <m1QpFUq-0001ipC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1QpFUq-0001ipC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.89.227.148]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B3C69AB170A64D989AB485ADC98FD04Anominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Lion/Snow Leaopard side-by-side on an IPv6 enabled ADSL2+ home line..
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:23:55 -0000

On Aug 5, 2011, at 4:10 AM, Philip Homburg wrote:
So what it boils down to is that Apple came up with their own HE
implementation without telling anybody or asking for feedback. And now that
they have shipped it, it has to be defended as being the best solution. Sad,
but that's usually how it works.

In all fairness, Apple was working on this implementation before HE was a glimmer in anybody's eye, and indeed Stuart Cheshire described it in some detail in a v6ops meeting about two years ago.   I kind of think it might have inspired the development of HE, but I may be wrong about that.   In any case, I think throwing stones here is not really constructive.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email