Re: [v6ops] Lion/Snow Leaopard side-by-side on an IPv6 enabled ADSL2+ home line..

Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> Fri, 05 August 2011 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dr@cluenet.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98AA21F8BDC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMMQRFMU3XDt for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.cluenet.de (mail1.cluenet.de [IPv6:2001:1440:201:101::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184C421F8BF8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3E18B108099; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:08:50 +0200
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110805140850.GA8376@srv03.cluenet.de>
Mail-Followup-To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CA+OBy1Mjpar6rSF2OCRJ6Mnsy4NMtNknMY_27CzUQRNzv56Vyw@mail.gmail.com> <B533E4F2-AC6E-4874-A99D-3E0C4B42CA62@apnic.net> <CA+OBy1P-eGv+-cwbezxTV9orH9LH5VXqJqUPs+jgszG1S0EvWg@mail.gmail.com> <47CBE645-71EE-48E6-9E3B-384E2C9BE821@apnic.net> <4E699@apple.com> <87805FCBB-A7A9-43A@apple.com> <78E0CEA6-3E21-42ED-9704-64383CF9B83F@apple.com> <m1QpFUq-0001ipC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <B3C69AB1-70A6-4D98-9AB4-85ADC98FD04A@nominum.com> <m1QpKqq-0001hHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m1QpKqq-0001hHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Lion/Snow Leaopard side-by-side on an IPv6 enabled ADSL2+ home line..
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:08:34 -0000

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:53:45PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
> It is always possible that as an operating system designer, you miss an
> operator perspective.

I get a distinct impression that the operator perspective wasn't of
relevant interest (and still isn't).

To make the IPv6 transission as painless as possible, all stakeholders
have to work together, based on a common "big picture".

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0