Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt]
Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 04:00 UTC
Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C693921F852A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWRlP03LG2Jg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFAE21F8528 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggmi1 with SMTP id i1so2432037ggm.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zv2OXwz5uJeebLZ4o8ves9z1CfauNO6VcgM80ZrPn8c=; b=nmPSuYQkfzlRbG++AJGAdzHyxBwGEa5fh7t2gVU24hme86Mn+r0v4Ncc9oNOflSAOl AXRT551tYNnWTLJy0Pc7ISfOkcwEcKVedMlP4WxDBGyIiMUclUOyb3yJwpkuQ7lFEuWh DldW6IQCcC6CKfN6PGDhM/q07HlaW0HjNiRF9sV1vggulGmPNGZXyQSJIbgA1CcvdC0s zowUwPEvDX2CTDunkq8U5uEODgEYMtxgwRTdpEUg7WmDEo4R/2SHIm55sxteHzETqSRb rspGr8L5lrTnY7YSIPDPQp+Gp4eQJTul8oLT6lvGcb088C38u4/aQvA5SGXTJ58i8O44 KY1g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.254.2 with SMTP id b2mr3652215ani.18.1331524832258; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.123.12 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F5CF9B2.5070702@gmail.com>
References: <4F45B554.2060103@gmail.com> <CANF0JMBbQsApjcDeiFK0pi-Qz=jOGFQVvCrPCPW+aVzCwTJx4g@mail.gmail.com> <4F5CF9B2.5070702@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:00:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CANF0JMBMwvAq7FNXpTOcEAjJrftgBfDaBsyBV43Qf33jN9fw-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016369fa371a2ec0d04bb03c8b3"
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:00:33 -0000
inline please, 2012/3/12 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> > Hi Deng, > > On 2012-03-12 04:35, Hui Deng wrote: > > Hi Authors, > > > > I have several comments about this draft: > > 1) do you want to classify different level of ICP, from the reading, this > > document is targetting at > > the ICP who are not faimliar with IPv6, but sometimes, ICP may deploy > their > > server in some IDC or some may > > be based on their own location, which may have different consideration; > > I think that our main target is an ICP that is mainly familiar with IPv4. > In the case of an ICP hosted by a hosting provider or IDC, I suppose we > are addressing the hosting provider, and we should say that. > > > > > 2) Most of ICP consider end to end IPv4 together with outside in and > inside > > out; > > Yes, we are assuming they are already supporting e2e IPv4. > > > > > > 3) Load balance is still needed which is same as today IPv4 even there > are > > no more traffic for IPv6, > > Not if only 1% of the traffics is from IPv6. It's only when the traffic > becomes large that you need load balancing. > loading balancing is sitting together with DDOS prevention and many other features, even 1%, they still need it. > > > for most ICP, they need to know the geo-location information during the > > packet going through the load balance. > > Sure. The point is only that the quality of the geolocation lookup > is alleged to be weaker for IPv6 today. Obviously this will improve. > this information is bundled with many other ICP services, this have to be considered anyway by them. > > > > > 4) ICP need to fully understand how to avoid DDOS when they launch the > > IPv6, otherwise they will always need NAT solution > > Can you explain that please? > this expecting that this document could explain how to avoid DDOS in detail, otherwise, they have to deploy special NAT to handle this by configure some policy over there. -Hui > > Thanks > > Brian > > > > Regards, > > > > -Hui > > > > > > 2012/2/23 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> This version has various updates due to comments from the WG. > >> > >> We are not asking for a meeting slot in Paris, but we'd like the > >> chairs to put the question whether the WG wants to adopt this > >> draft. In any case we still want more input to correct and > >> expand the draft. > >> > >> Brian + Sheng > >> > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt > >> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:30:09 -0800 > >> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > >> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org > >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > >> Internet-Drafts directories. > >> > >> Title : IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and > >> Application Service Providers > >> Author(s) : Brian Carpenter > >> Sheng Jiang > >> Filename : draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt > >> Pages : 18 > >> Date : 2012-02-22 > >> > >> This document provides guidance and suggestions for Internet > >> Content > >> Providers and Application Service Providers who wish to offer > >> their > >> service to both IPv6 and IPv4 customers. Many of the points will > >> also apply to any enterprise network preparing for IPv6 users. > >> > >> > >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > >> > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > >> > >> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> I-D-Announce mailing list > >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > >> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> v6ops mailing list > >> v6ops@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > >> > > >
- [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-i… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… John Mann
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… John Mann
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Hui Deng
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Arturo Servin
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Hui Deng
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Hui Deng
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Hui Deng