Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt]

Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 11 March 2012 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B06E21F8486 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-W6DbAkX6Wo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E7121F8483 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (46.sub-166-250-35.myvzw.com [166.250.35.46]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2BJNf3i025484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:23:42 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4F5CFBB8.9050502@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:23:36 -0700
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
References: <4F45B554.2060103@gmail.com> <CANF0JMBbQsApjcDeiFK0pi-Qz=jOGFQVvCrPCPW+aVzCwTJx4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANF0JMBbQsApjcDeiFK0pi-Qz=jOGFQVvCrPCPW+aVzCwTJx4g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:23:45 -0000

On 3/11/12 08:35 , Hui Deng wrote:
> 4) ICP need to fully understand how to avoid DDOS when they launch the
> IPv6, otherwise they will always need NAT solution

I'm mystified by this statement... network address translators that
aren't stateless  (much like firewalls) are a huge DOS bottleneck in a
service that accepts unsolicited incoming connections. As far as I'm
concerned they shouldn't be employeed unless they can be load-balanced.

If they cause the loss of the original v6 source address along the way
that's no good since I need that.

> Regards,
>  
> -Hui
> 
> 
> 2012/2/23 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     This version has various updates due to comments from the WG.
> 
>     We are not asking for a meeting slot in Paris, but we'd like the
>     chairs to put the question whether the WG wants to adopt this
>     draft. In any case we still want more input to correct and
>     expand the draft.
> 
>        Brian + Sheng
> 
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
>     Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:30:09 -0800
>     From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>     Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>     To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> 
> 
>     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
>     Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
>            Title           : IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and
>     Application Service Providers
>            Author(s)       : Brian Carpenter
>                              Sheng Jiang
>            Filename        : draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
>            Pages           : 18
>            Date            : 2012-02-22
> 
>       This document provides guidance and suggestions for Internet
>     Content
>       Providers and Application Service Providers who wish to offer
>     their
>       service to both IPv6 and IPv4 customers.  Many of the points will
>       also apply to any enterprise network preparing for IPv6 users.
> 
> 
>     A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>     http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
> 
>     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
>     This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     I-D-Announce mailing list
>     I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>     Internet-Draft
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announceInternet-Draft>
>     directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>     or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     v6ops mailing list
>     v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops