Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09

Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com> Sat, 20 March 2010 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5DB3A6968 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.831, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ieLZjr9g1jw for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365773A6955 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Nt7JT-0004mb-Jh for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:38:35 +0000
Received: from [171.68.10.86] (helo=sj-iport-4.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <townsley@cisco.com>) id 1Nt7JO-0004m0-Kl for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:38:31 +0000
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,279,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="103388246"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2010 22:38:29 +0000
Received: from iwan-view3.cisco.com (iwan-view3.cisco.com [171.70.65.13]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2KMcTSN023906; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:38:29 GMT
Received: from ams-townsley-8719.cisco.com (ams-townsley-8719.cisco.com [10.55.233.234]) by iwan-view3.cisco.com (8.11.2/CISCO.WS.1.2) with ESMTP id o2KMcSY10959; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BA54E63.2020206@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:38:27 +0100
From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
CC: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09
References: <D6F5ACD2-EB43-477E-9F48-AC3EDB3F7EB4@apple.com> <4BA3BBCF.2090903@cisco.com> <4BA3D1B3.4010501@gmail.com> <4BA3DAAA.10000@cisco.com> <4BA40DD1.7080306@gmail.com> <6C168711-6A34-4487-9911-92766513183C@apple.com> <4BA522E8.7050504@cisco.com> <F5D29FBE-403A-4615-BA47-7D054D3F5E0B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5D29FBE-403A-4615-BA47-7D054D3F5E0B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On 3/20/10 8:54 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> I use such a device in my home as part of an enterprise network...
>    
The point is that the document is clearly scoped to residential and 
small office settings.

- Mark
> On Mar 20, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Mark Townsley wrote:
>
>    
>> On 3/20/10 1:32 AM, james woodyatt wrote:
>>      
>>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 16:50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> But I'm afraid that the simplicity of 'default deny' has long
>>>> ago won the hearts and minds of enterprise network managers.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> Sadly, enterprise network managers aren't the only people whose legitimate interests are at stake in the matter under discussion.
>>>
>>>        
>> This document is clearly scoped in the first sentence of the Introduction to:
>>
>> "gateway devices that enable delivery of Internet services in residential and small office settings."
>>
>> So, I'm not sure why we are even considering enterprise network managers here.
>>
>> The networks themselves, the assets under protection, the types of applications, are quite different
>> between and enterprise network and residential network.
>>
>> - Mark
>>      
>>> --
>>> james woodyatt<jhw@apple.com>
>>> member of technical staff, communications engineering
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>      
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>
>
>