Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Fri, 19 March 2010 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5090E3A6A77 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.643
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.643 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEh8DJ-K+dQu for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E34A3A6A69 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NskNq-000MIn-L8 for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:34 +0000
Received: from [17.254.13.23] (helo=mail-out4.apple.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jhw@apple.com>) id 1NskNl-000MHR-Qp for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:29 +0000
Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3CC913DD11 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7c97ae00000413c-25-4ba3f61842f6
Received: from il0602b-dhcp111.apple.com (il0602b-dhcp111.apple.com [17.206.24.111]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 95.30.16700.816F3AB4; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Subject: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BA3D1B3.4010501@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:09:28 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9EEBEB1D-8D88-45DB-9200-EBE2ED0D84CF@apple.com>
References: <D6F5ACD2-EB43-477E-9F48-AC3EDB3F7EB4@apple.com> <4BA3BBCF.2090903@cisco.com> <4BA3D1B3.4010501@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:34, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> So I want to say: let's not add *anything*. Let's just push it out in a matter of weeks.

I'm currently sitting on a couple of minor edits:

+ Cite RFC 4007 to clear up confusion about multicast group scope boundaries.
+ Fix some inconsistencies between cpe-simple-security and RFC 4890.

I'm planning to post the -10 revision tonight, then start revising my slides for Monday morning.  We shall see if there is a rough consensus for sending the -10 revision up the stack in the days following the meeting, or if further wrangling over it in the working group is in order.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering