IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 21 February 2012 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4733A21E802E; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guBosixztZsV; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813421E8016; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_joStrLDg7w+TI2x4CMgxtQ)"
Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0LZP009JBW024DX1@mail-out.apple.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7b1aae0000062d9-80-4f42e578d107
Received: from [17.153.48.205] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.48.205]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 37.A2.25305.975E24F4; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:45 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3040761AD@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:29:44 -0800
Message-id: <E13CC6CB-44AF-4702-B35D-1CDC22233259@apple.com>
References: "29 Jan 2012 09:51:52 PST." <85BE2EBF-C8AC-45E1-BF93-1E3066AD3172@apple.com> <201201301936.q0UJaEft000156@givry.fdupont.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025B49@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <4A687585-399D-4077-91AC-A1DC4F101E03@apple.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025BFE@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <30931DE1-9E57-4296-B0FE-FA98F840D78F@apple.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3040761AD@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
To: Hemant Singh <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiONPgrG7lUyd/g9VbBSwm/f3JaHHz6kUW i8nHfrNa3Pp1jc3i9LG9zA6sHi/75zB6TPm9kdVjyZKfTB5fLn9mC2CJ4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL 4Mo48n0Ja8ETvYofs+cwNTAu0ehi5OSQEDCRuH5sARuELSZx4d56IJuLQ0hgKpNE85l5LCAJ YQFrib3tj1hBbF4BQ4mZr9rBbGaBBImPl96D1bAJqEh8u3yXCcTmFPCVmL+9FyzOIqAqMe/B L2aQocwCPYwS/QdmQw2ykXgw6SQTxLZDzBLX+6cxgiREBPQkHu98wApxkqzE7YP7mSYw8s1C snwWkuUQtrbEsoWvmSFsA4mnna9YMcX1Jd68m8O0gJFtFaNgUWpOYqWhqV5iQUFOql5yfu4m RlBwNxSa7WDc8VfuEKMAB6MSD29iuZO/EGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHesqVAId6UxMqq1KL8+KLS nNTiQ4zSHCxK4ry8hkApgfTEktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDY8edm++Pt1lPyU/6zbdk8YxJhddm lO5bpH27uDJLxu/n4g05qzjZ2q5lqfo/YZknlBV+tX7R9MAbc1ew/zmnu29J6w9Th/+ySwR1 3df2S8y+eF9HkKVWpubf6tsKzfzid+aLmJ3bFGiuLlDwim/nh4K+/cJLCgJObVKysOhYs2dC 23GtTRqT9iuxFGckGmoxFxUnAgDNzuKtagIAAA==
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, PCP <pcp@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:29:47 -0000

On Feb 20, 2012, at 14:28 , Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
>  
> Sorry for the delay.   Along the lines of what Barbara already said, I would like to add that major host OS’s  such as Microsoft Windows nor MAC OS (?) support a PCP client yet?  At least till a few months back -  vendors can keep me honest.   If a host does not support a PCP client, what host will issue PCP requests to a PCP server in the IPv6 CPE router?   Thus it makes sense to let the homenet WG deal with the PCP server req on the CPE router LAN and we ship rfc6204bis with the PCP client req that Alain Durand agreed with for DS-Lite use.  Thanks to Dave Thaler who helped prepare text for the specific PCP client req in the CPE.

In other words, you're telling me there's no point in implementing a PCP client for IPv6 simple security in a host operating system, because none of the IPv6 Ready CE routers will have PCP servers.  Good to know.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email