Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 06 November 2023 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA0EC1FB878 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:49:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxfN-CkxYC0u for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56551C15108E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3A6Bn00h058632 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:49:00 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BEC812121E3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:49:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B795F20DC8D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:49:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.32.70] (is156570.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.70]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3A6Bn0ff015004 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:49:00 +0100
Message-ID: <d1ee5a4a-d4fa-49b7-8f4c-b2f1c8e965ff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 12:49:00 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: fr
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <169919966581.36738.5162400304409089286@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BATnx3n2hPf5i2=9rH-gpV=oXkT6rxoQw2eQ9dY81mRNVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BATnx3n2hPf5i2=9rH-gpV=oXkT6rxoQw2eQ9dY81mRNVw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CEA-Virus: SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9LXNVakKCUB5rH_R8WpXmu-Eys0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:49:05 -0000

Nit: in Figure 1 this address needs an additional ':' or 3 other hextets:

2001:db8:ddd0:2:6666

Alex

Le 05/11/2023 à 17:17, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Following the conclusion of the WGLC (thanks to everyone who
> commented!), we've submitted a -05 version with the following changes:
> 1. Making it more clear that the draft requires the network to
> delegate a SLAAC-suitable prefix, and /64 is currently required for
> SLAAC to work - but it  doesn't have to be like that in the future.
> Examples also use /64. Brian, does it address your comment?
> 2. To address most of Ole's comments:
>    2.1 Making it explicit that the draft only covers the network
> behavior, while host requirements are out of scope.
>    2.2 Clarifying that the network can support both flat and
> hierarchical models - it's up to the host to specify the hint.
> 3. Rewriting examples in the prefix length consideration section to
> make it clearer that the proposal does not require an excessive amount
> of IPv6 space.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 4:54 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt has
>> been successfully submitted by Jen Linkova and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:     draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device
>> Revision: 05
>> Title:    Using DHCPv6-PD to Allocate Unique IPv6 Prefix per Client in Large Broadcast Networks
>> Date:     2023-11-05
>> Group:    v6ops
>> Pages:    20
>> URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt
>> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device/
>> HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.html
>> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device
>> Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>     This document discusses an IPv6 deployment scenario when individual
>>     clients connected to large broadcast networks (such as enterprise
>>     networks or public Wi-Fi networks) are allocated unique prefixes via
>>     DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD).
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>