IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 05 November 2023 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792EC15199B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 11:24:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 372kkFv7Wqei for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 11:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa1-x2d.google.com (mail-oa1-x2d.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8862C151984 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 11:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa1-x2d.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1f00b95dc43so2376667fac.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 11:24:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699212255; x=1699817055; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i1Y9rVvFp3goCmx04n5oXfc99YRXBhqchac8J3joy6g=; b=LtLF0Y4HCeYpXJniUs51ccUP+dEAR8Pko0uim/YsECOx5XX3q07or0dLXoWfXtEMT5 DcrUK/LhlgIDGssCN+mtbVCRvxe77rVrrvKIQJvLRoM6Fr+/mQNU6xVkB0A0WxjRVWvP vQ+mDAp/HixXI+uIRQo6hlM5qvzkMeTrRHtddDAtfA7DQhjNHtEf8m6Pjdx4SKzKqUi0 qi2So0mEtbGLrOSsZU0gQu7YqbB6s44Zl9aFr3jwUaTwDCgO0J7IdHVeWz8QqgfHWwxJ /qB/kCWDuHfo3LU1+aRQCq2NsUsEK6/5kDOmOK0oDx7iID3BT9i/McyhrlCRLUiK9xmQ 1mCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699212255; x=1699817055; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i1Y9rVvFp3goCmx04n5oXfc99YRXBhqchac8J3joy6g=; b=q/jSdTS8hsUeiFR9qz0eRaaI8TDoQgtL66G13o437GRAkmF5CpCUno/Usa6y5Zynhx 60anaKIagkUxmfF1CP37icqNG85snGG5tY+qtyh6XgLneAiJ9pR0o2yLF1vdPIPfRSh4 RujPAMzAowRy4n2/5rFUfDHv/w8/hQmX67r/MK1avyfIzEhUFETt99Szp2E2TAFDIYMR DuE/qeuXvczHSNqBkQ3PJK2zDV6sYGibmOTAtVzxmeguHkFb8Ev4vyhV3G8sjf/XM0C9 Lkw+v+ALKrWDMW1g6yCTtr+x5zFz8oo/DlexeImRA/8EfK2ofHVz7wAm3lwa6ySl0+m/ 7Wzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztI7Tfs7EJrag61VuQ1zBWG5+RbwzE75IhO2Z8Kfnk7bxHrw8k aTUNhBGT9WKhy02Mis/DkxA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmzpxPFXwT1rQxKC6yfXmXivlkWKb7rZ742YvlqoRgtgb9OJ9tAB3nw6wvDpgD/hvCG5Y33g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:548d:b0:1e9:8eaf:c369 with SMTP id f13-20020a056870548d00b001e98eafc369mr33428739oan.43.1699212255017; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 11:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:110d:5301:8cb6:a2c:7461:4047? ([2406:e003:110d:5301:8cb6:a2c:7461:4047]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w20-20020a634914000000b0059cc2f1b7basm4221942pga.11.2023.11.05.11.24.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Nov 2023 11:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6de0be12-83e9-dd57-a6c0-fea5f4ad14f7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 08:24:09 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Xiao Ma <xiaom@google.com>
References: <169919966581.36738.5162400304409089286@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BATnx3n2hPf5i2=9rH-gpV=oXkT6rxoQw2eQ9dY81mRNVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BATnx3n2hPf5i2=9rH-gpV=oXkT6rxoQw2eQ9dY81mRNVw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iMjlRqYX1zFU9KAfquMXsncGijA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 19:24:19 -0000

On 06-Nov-23 05:17, Jen Linkova wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Following the conclusion of the WGLC (thanks to everyone who
> commented!), we've submitted a -05 version with the following changes:
> 1. Making it more clear that the draft requires the network to
> delegate a SLAAC-suitable prefix, and /64 is currently required for
> SLAAC to work - but it  doesn't have to be like that in the future.
> Examples also use /64. Brian, does it address your comment?

Yes, thank you. I think I have succeeded in diverting discussion
of this issue from this thread!

    Brian

> 2. To address most of Ole's comments:
>    2.1 Making it explicit that the draft only covers the network
> behavior, while host requirements are out of scope.
>    2.2 Clarifying that the network can support both flat and
> hierarchical models - it's up to the host to specify the hint.
> 3. Rewriting examples in the prefix length consideration section to
> make it clearer that the proposal does not require an excessive amount
> of IPv6 space.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 4:54 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt has
>> been successfully submitted by Jen Linkova and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:     draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device
>> Revision: 05
>> Title:    Using DHCPv6-PD to Allocate Unique IPv6 Prefix per Client in Large Broadcast Networks
>> Date:     2023-11-05
>> Group:    v6ops
>> Pages:    20
>> URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.txt
>> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device/
>> HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05.html
>> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device
>> Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-05
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>     This document discusses an IPv6 deployment scenario when individual
>>     clients connected to large broadcast networks (such as enterprise
>>     networks or public Wi-Fi networks) are allocated unique prefixes via
>>     DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD).
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email