IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Sat, 01 June 2013 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D3B21F86F0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 04:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZLKqjyC95zs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 04:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B66121F86DC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 04:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0E45E9C; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 04:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; s=selector1; bh=VEeWt14siOT70dtL2/3/WviiFAg=; b=IOfZIbudCnv/Hdt OtpCqGApW7reuRmQy3C1Ul1icocgh/3tgh7ufSm5Ix0/yRBizY8YF8w4TAWfluQ7 Gpi3Z/agh9HoK9gRkkk82Q8thQnLMphxq0YAU6JEA9uFsPBwDhdMvIYWZs1vVegL Xz/NCL4ndBKn+lK7OpxsQZV+Gc5c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=references :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=nkxqe WOn+RdSoSBm5aSUwF2VzHhpoSmDkBN0M3AQVuRtWxovFyu36jDQlu7unfFBWQPft EsEks9QWsACbiDGYgDxQ4V+FKCB7ZHxfdBRpfa05I6HgyYMLbOtBSg3lMmBvzdO/ ijYXrcDGA0+xRLHsFwAJncDFaMO/oHveoW5PFk=
Received: from [192.168.1.117] (unknown [195.159.143.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A7A05E5C; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 04:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAKD1Yr29kf1Me=6JR66Gq0dFYgQx2wq=pjW8WZyHByPA0POsMQ@mail.gmail.com> <1369901467.70362.YahooMailNeo@web142506.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <51A7C86B.3020808@gmail.com> <BCEC2341-CF91-4184-B14A-FE0BE683F89F@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751BFE04@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <4CB10EDC-1E2B-4423-AD77-7B6062F80579@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C01BD@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C01BD@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D41922F4-CD88-4530-AD90-E985F1905CE3@employees.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:15:22 +0200
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:15:36 -0000

On 1 Jun 2013, at 12:54, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On May 31, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> The TTL Exceeded packet shouldn't get forwarded by any router as a result of the LL Source address.
>> Thus it should never reach its destination.
>> Thus it will break traceroutes.
>> Thus it is harmful.
> 
> So you're arguing that every router on the internet needs a global IP address?

Every node on the IPv6 internet needs a global IPv6 address. 

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email