IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 01 June 2013 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760DC21F9D91 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCljP494B0eh for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF23F21F9D49 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u16so4310952iet.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TeENBQheWgry4AmyU+36+d9b3/b8pfEjr9QT9lkSDIA=; b=iEHTqshUE4PO5KMKmisJTCipXHLPv6708yQGthK2XYMLvh954wyZERaw3gQbcMj5/G w8n4CFeNOG/7nYs2OyZTJIGurQbcIr3E4o865LTtrIu6tRiNVeh9vx+6t4+sUZJ4ixlB Us8stqkwu+8IkWZcUERT1Nu/T77Okq21cEZZzKVylyrrjm7/rTIZQNV6zRFHq+BkjHRy 0rB6Tn6oGmxjblQ8QMzp2aexqUTH+amjSKhKn0cMs4h21aClQmvurxpPi/q6yEIHN+pV WXVxMNZoX/OirHXjW3mpK7IOOKN1qKf4AR+Dj84KQR0hwdVDqupSmsSt9CgouYum+0To Opow==
X-Received: by 10.50.114.228 with SMTP id jj4mr4645951igb.38.1370120021342; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (224.171.252.27.dyn.cust.vf.net.nz. [27.252.171.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm9917528igx.1.2013.06.01.13.53.37 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51AA5F4F.9010509@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 08:53:35 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr29kf1Me=6JR66Gq0dFYgQx2wq=pjW8WZyHByPA0POsMQ@mail.gmail.com> <1369901467.70362.YahooMailNeo@web142506.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <51A7C86B.3020808@gmail.com> <BCEC2341-CF91-4184-B14A-FE0BE683F89F@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751BFE04@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <4CB10EDC-1E2B-4423-AD77-7B6062F80579@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C01BD@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <D41922F4-CD88-4530-AD90-E985F1905CE3@employees.org> <2EFF47FB-D3E5-4020-9AB6-57201CA40888@steffann.nl> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C0650@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <51AA201E.1060407@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C0771@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C0771@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<v6ops@ietf.org>" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:53:48 -0000

On 02/06/2013 04:33, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do we end up saying that every node in the IPv6 Internet needs at least two addresses?

There is a case for s/node/interface/ in that statement.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email