IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Sun, 02 June 2013 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9966E21F9E10 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMt-nCWFswgY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC2421F9E0F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.6.83] (ip-64-134-24-48.public.wayport.net [64.134.24.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5254nAg025047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:04:50 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com r5254nAg025047
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1370149491; bh=0n0uRChGZainFWKLRgymJNWBbOI=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=38OcDp5nw1lnkCWtP7xL35AmsIRf1UCTgguTiQ3v4vkCx8K+E9z5uR3W7rODBEEkB ou3tAgObQBUbMGEW/fgyvm7kufOWSWeo/p/Kc9RGWpax/L6RfBLZWUx9/DVGySTxgL NdojcYhrTDISc8h1jCz1UH64J+XYoDhBmVMlniL8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <51AA201E.1060407@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 00:04:50 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C2DA0077-1276-4760-A4A1-B544B84C94C7@delong.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr29kf1Me=6JR66Gq0dFYgQx2wq=pjW8WZyHByPA0POsMQ@mail.gmail.com> <1369901467.70362.YahooMailNeo@web142506.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <51A7C86B.3020808@gmail.com> <BCEC2341-CF91-4184-B14A-FE0BE683F89F@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751BFE04@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <4CB10EDC-1E2B-4423-AD77-7B6062F80579@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C01BD@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <D41922F4-CD88-4530-AD90-E985F1905CE3@employees.org> <2EFF47FB-D3E5-4020-9AB6-57201CA40888@steffann.nl> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C0650@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <51AA201E.1060407@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A good example of why we need to careful about ULAs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 05:08:08 -0000

On Jun 1, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 01/06/2013 18:16, Ted Lemon a écrit :
>> On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
>> wrote:
>>>>> So you're arguing that every router on the internet needs a
>>>>> global IP address?
>>>> 
>>>> Every node on the IPv6 internet needs a global IPv6 address.
> 
> I am divided on this.
> 
> The link local address is also mandatory.
> 
> Do we end up saying that every node in the IPv6 Internet needs at least two addresses?
> 

Yes

Owen

> Alex
> 
>>> 
>>> +1
>> 
>> So I also +1 this, but if people are seeing traceroutes with ULAs in
>> them, apparently _someone_ doesn't agree.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email