IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Google Alert - IPv6

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04CD13FD06 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svUMht_5LRkL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C078013FD05 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z19so3863156qtg.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XLSuprw+dgP2pG71k8MQlIDlsIx0/m3FOH9Geqk5/i8=; b=bdb3BiLjppve0/8ogF9dCX32MzLX/FBxTBhLMkgcPkxC5ORXK62K3TGD017Gq3nOVb 3QiOvKpfwdC9CVXfjpAINCdWx9iW/IFSFrIHxErU9nNKnxuuD/rUeLjQUK6NSZJhVhRl Sn/JLpC89KRbBiqfZL36/Rn/ptKE7NAjcZ0JiYl8QCnQwCOh9Ec9CEIVyoU8/KZDjRJL C1Ki0aVNTGuj2Zz1xdzhnrL/In8AMjSmBAFY9C8eWe5GQWLmQRUxVfRRzQYdoKoYoT7p PxQnQn9k/uD9XtDntfwWGJuE4MJOWZxJu98u9yzYikq8FKMguDJuAN70lIp0IV8aS3VL w4JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XLSuprw+dgP2pG71k8MQlIDlsIx0/m3FOH9Geqk5/i8=; b=NvuKsL8Q/qySCyckPTvA7KMBxyadW2xO9Qpd7mkGqVC/aN2rGUgnNWtWp5qHzwpqnC xBN06GTcPCZUN14ao4lrjOCjux/E5N4sauPiLWdwQQtHj1HGSOm5gmVSMJ66CVdszesE UAUQ4NUHtM0PkD+b/KD9xfVnWK5VXPjmrjjcitbLHdA8nSzt9SAyPUzYs7+AXZerDlDO +wjMjKDo8ETqTYwAkqOCsgn96SkNdCzr2trbsJL1MU4QDKklBped9sHnJrsn9fqd65Y1 xDRsSd4gYGuFDxV7cH0j0JNAiMdyiRxcIACdjinhJxdrab1af/Y9Hha+VZae0RTydSK6 dJrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW1Qg631/g1Vu9bX9QrdKV1Bpl+p2ZYcnUCj+lVqdsKq2rShiYM b/U5xbbRbtm2YTWQFzF+1ODz+1pMjaYa/Bcnjdh9TQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SQo4Y/svMWdFwu/JzQ4BfmtptwdiW/oMYLZrBtdsDJt5agJb1zGZwPIK2m9xwx2vMiIiEtAb/HS3j5RdMKp0c=
X-Received: by 10.237.35.58 with SMTP id h55mr1363154qtc.108.1509562013858; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.54.4 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F8571B9-FCF3-4E6D-87AE-2AA5D37F917E@consulintel.es>
References: <f403045ef57ac52962055bd88b84@google.com> <20395E98-DA55-447F-BEFE-CB581A88BB78@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710190655260.31961@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20171019083506.6627a166@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710190856530.31961@uplift.swm.pp.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A056EB5@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAHw9_iLWAMexrfXwsdB8duGa5ueJMofqVRqNck6DeOzA=KChqA@mail.gmail.com> <C4E37677-A2FB-49F8-B362-C29B28DFD570@daveor.com> <CE4906A4-E0CC-4C3F-A1F8-D2B5BED294D7@employees.org> <EDC5E9C7-F193-40CE-B21C-8E1D91E9E7E3@daveor.com> <C71D6C23-2720-403F-B655-D8156898A137@employees.org> <CALx6S37E9TN9SyMQfk3CSx9vWzjBM3bmuhvsyN0tFXGYFz9Mjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yXH0sPJYXJ6Nrq0B=UaDK4mC1R2Tds1tFQeBhuVh5meg@mail.gmail.com> <F0990C2F-0626-4416-AA5D-1AAE41C24510@gmail.com> <A9FAF661-C5DB-4EE2-8175-56FF50792B27@gmail.com> <C01E3F52-46F8-4BDC-91C8-052310673E6E@consulintel.es> <20171101073231.653A48DDFD9C@rock.dv.isc.org> <2013D3DA-0366-41F2-A0E8-07F5563C5D07@consulintel.es> <CALx6S37D2ziwr39H3SXWYXY48+GgnMBeiVrvsqVmwYCBqwPDcg@mail.gmail.com> <C1461E71-8E2C-4215-BB60-9C736510E810@consulintel.es> <CALx6S34x-D86SFqQd5+Cd6Kz+yuP0yX_FxvY6KXhr1XMu9gK_A@mail.gmail.com> <4F8571B9-FCF3-4E6D-87AE-2AA5D37F917E@consulintel.es>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:46:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S34U9SjrhWqYx2zUc-Mv++-ryjs0g5-x6CRXB+pW4OKsgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/EZQRQ9YObGLHBO-qrJPjrTff8D4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Google Alert - IPv6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 18:46:57 -0000

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:21 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Broken (in my opinion) in the sense of the EU privacy considerations.
>
> They consider IP addresses as personal data, which is not. And this consideration has many implications and extra cost for operators, etc., as it implies further security measures to keep that data “safe”.
>
Jordi,

That might be an issue to take up with EU then. AFAICT an effort
illegalize CGNAT or limit the number of users behind a NAT address is
an attempt to put PII into IP addresses for law enforcement purposes.
This is policy, there's nothing inherent in IP protocol or addressing
architecture that prevents that. The article that Mark posted
(https://telsoc.org/ajtde/2015-04-v3-n1/a4) might demonstrate that
implementing such a policy is futile to achieving its underlying
goals.

Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email