Re: [v6ops] About Req for Comments - "Transition to IPv6"

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4C3A1FF3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZiqg04mCQdJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD133A10D2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiev.delong.com (kiev.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930:0:0:0:200:5]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02G75xag4057293 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:05:59 -0700
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Message-Id: <8630BF2A-9831-44EE-8CA3-0C3647E86EDE@delong.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4E3B1C1B-0328-444C-BE45-A7701E22A1D9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:05:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=pekqP8X1+-vqPEJpdLptiqbEvOGQmdin2EmBKGPfiFSA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
References: <e8a25961-5ac9-d35e-77dd-bf86f45cd077@gmail.com> <7eb4dc25-28a6-4927-2356-846e200681d2@gmail.com> <0791D4B0-8390-48D7-AF0A-CE004EC3224C@consulintel.es> <ccc75efb-8c00-ee97-5cc7-2e061e6e5a54@gmail.com> <52b6b9a4f46a49598eccee1b35e5efc5@irs.gov> <89127c25-9c51-c4bb-97ae-3567e80a4c52@gmail.com> <43D0E5A1-E5C5-4ACA-A44D-BC2F67129174@delong.com> <a7269431-c8a3-4182-072d-4bc1a39fcd57@gmail.com> <AC76A63B-3C93-4721-BE73-1851EBA25878@delong.com> <CAEmG1=pekqP8X1+-vqPEJpdLptiqbEvOGQmdin2EmBKGPfiFSA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930:0:0:0:200:2]); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Fx-CPt9nP8qWHl_tWrX_Vw1fwCg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] About Req for Comments - "Transition to IPv6"
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:06:07 -0000


> On Mar 15, 2020, at 16:32 , Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:54 AM Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com <mailto:owen@delong.com>> wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Is facebook a network?  I thought of it like a server farm.
> 
> How does one run a distributed server farm throughout the world without connecting it with a network? Am I missing something?
> 
> I believe for a very long time, that would have accurately described Akamai.

Akamai didn’t run a backbone. I’d argue that they did run many rather sizable networks.

> Until their announcement, long after they had established themselves in the marketplace, that they were going to deploy a network: https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG71/1532/20171003_Kaufmann_Lightning_Talk_Akamai_v1.pdf <https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG71/1532/20171003_Kaufmann_Lightning_Talk_Akamai_v1.pdf>
Oh, I’m very familiar with that particular project… It was in it’s startup hey day during my tenure in Mr. Kaufmann’s group. That was Akamai building a backbone to connect many (not nearly all) of their networks together.

I stand by my original statement. One cannot (usefully) run a server farm without a network. Network != backbone.

Owen