Re: [v6ops] About Req for Comments - "Transition to IPv6"

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 05/03/2020 à 13:25, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
> This is why I've insisted several times in having a document describing what is IPv6-only ...
> 
> I can update it again if the WG is interested ...
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only-04

To me it might make sense to start from there.

At this time, although I can click on the URL, it leads to a phrase "The 
attached draft memorandum prepared by the Office of Management and 
Budget, in collaboration with the Federal Chief Information Officers 
Council and Federal Chief Information Security Officers Council, 
supports the Administration’s goals for modernizing Federal Information 
Technology".  I can not find that 'draft memorandum'.

I can not find precisely what are the questions to comment on.  Or there 
might be no precise question, just an overall indication of ambition.

Alex

>   
> 
> El 5/3/20 13:13, "v6ops en nombre de Alexandre Petrescu" <[e-mail] en nombre de [e-mail]> escribió:
> 
>      
>      I learned from an IPv6 old timer at an ITU meeting about this "Request
>      for Comments on Updated Guidance for Completing the Transition to the
>      Next Generation Internet Protocol, Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)"
>      
>      https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/02/2020-04202/request-for-comments-on-updated-guidance-for-completing-the-transition-to-the-next-generation
>      
>      It mainly concerns organisations in the United States of America, but
>      they seek 'public' comment in 30 days, which amounts to about everyone,
>      I think.
>      
>      One comment that I would like to make is to better explain what
>      IPv6-only is.  To distinguish from the IPv6-only claimed in some cases,
>      at mobile operators, which is carried by IPv4 in fact.  And to comment
>      that I hope that Request for Comments' hope of transition to IPv6 is
>      pure IPv6 not carried by IPv4.
>      
>      I could send that comment to the indicated email address
>      "[e-mail]" but I suppose there might be some risk of that
>      message getting lost.
>      
>      Alex
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>      v6ops mailing list
>      [e-mail]
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>      
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>