Re: [v6ops] About Req for Comments - "Transition to IPv6"

Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> Wed, 18 March 2020 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mpetach@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0D3A1AA4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qk2ueNoDNyEZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f179.google.com (mail-il1-f179.google.com [209.85.166.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B683A1A9E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f179.google.com with SMTP id l14so24794566ilj.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PP0sjov4XBchMTTWD5UC5NHXTvJVPB6/nErPRjYNAQM=; b=GsC4gY/kP1cfvJvhirrfLIixLAcFMtaMhJofWqhd1iUuf7kKfgxQto1vY0mK0jiMa7 zfsB5Thp1YNPuxItPqrsFon00LbnOw3VXNjXIsX5jrZDVm3R+65SgfZj4o7o9R6DT80c jrkuLlGrYlNlzWG+1LutFSOfwBpIJ/emazk4mMZuk/4t9rSwBuMVLEC6R7v6yflrOf/7 rFuLilP8GgNfuoHwUlFN/5S3Gc4p3WFfZ4LBepDdKVT1vN3eJ/7C14WQWrw+bkqb8Jdl 5fmb30M0WqQT4Embg2mDQs1C6ZOJv80jFlLoTj8S6A41Q2bMlnwrEJ5VazZMW4VW4SLD RIKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Px0RZ2jja7YEKqkFq2mR3TEb8Gs/dtIHhfK9MexW2hjTwwGVA t3oX0VgJRBe/xv0oqClyUsIUqVGM0dHBWYj2CUQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtduQeiaXBicUo8uffnMHEQJpi0gnKuRBoJBBs5jqHX6WPO68y6T6MoXWPC9Mv07FuIEOh94NBtbok9dwIfnB0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:89d5:: with SMTP id w82mr5504678ilk.95.1584559939339; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e8a25961-5ac9-d35e-77dd-bf86f45cd077@gmail.com> <7eb4dc25-28a6-4927-2356-846e200681d2@gmail.com> <0791D4B0-8390-48D7-AF0A-CE004EC3224C@consulintel.es> <ccc75efb-8c00-ee97-5cc7-2e061e6e5a54@gmail.com> <52b6b9a4f46a49598eccee1b35e5efc5@irs.gov> <89127c25-9c51-c4bb-97ae-3567e80a4c52@gmail.com> <43D0E5A1-E5C5-4ACA-A44D-BC2F67129174@delong.com> <a7269431-c8a3-4182-072d-4bc1a39fcd57@gmail.com> <AC76A63B-3C93-4721-BE73-1851EBA25878@delong.com> <CAEmG1=pekqP8X1+-vqPEJpdLptiqbEvOGQmdin2EmBKGPfiFSA@mail.gmail.com> <8630BF2A-9831-44EE-8CA3-0C3647E86EDE@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <8630BF2A-9831-44EE-8CA3-0C3647E86EDE@delong.com>
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:32:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEmG1=oRHi1q4=vFbRkY+FyvEJUZ1fy2YAD2JAjkJPrUyGSdWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f4e3105a1261ca5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wTUkltJkx7WScF8Q6spxbO7OZ0w>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] About Req for Comments - "Transition to IPv6"
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:32:25 -0000

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:06 AM Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:

> On Mar 15, 2020, at 16:32 , Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
>
  On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:54 AM Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <
>> alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is facebook a network?  I thought of it like a server farm.
>>
>> How does one run a distributed server farm throughout the world without
>> connecting it with a network? Am I missing something?
>>
>
> I believe for a very long time, that would have accurately described
> Akamai.
>
>
> Akamai didn’t run a backbone. I’d argue that they did run many rather
> sizable networks.
>
> Until their announcement, long after they had established themselves in
> the marketplace, that they were going to deploy a network:
> https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG71/1532/20171003_Kaufmann_Lightning_Talk_Akamai_v1.pdf
>
>
> Oh, I’m very familiar with that particular project… It was in it’s startup
> hey day during my tenure in Mr. Kaufmann’s group. That was Akamai building
> a backbone to connect many (not nearly all) of their networks together.
>
> I stand by my original statement. One cannot (usefully) run a server farm
> without a network. Network != backbone.
>

Fair point.

Having spent so much of my career focusing on global backbones, I did
become somewhat myopic in my focus on what Networks were.

Yes, datacenter have networks as well.

Apologies for brushing them off so cavalierly.  ^_^;;


>
> Owen
>
>
Matt