IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC

Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz> Mon, 16 September 2013 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3673111E824B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BArcHqSlZ7-o for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz (ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz [93.153.104.87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250D811E823E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srvhk503.rdm.cz (unknown [10.254.92.81]) by ctxmailhub.t-mobile.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9362E09B6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:36:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRVHKE02.rdm.cz ([fe80::94ce:8456:f6fa:86a8]) by srvhk503.rdm.cz ([fe80::a0bc:fdcc:adf9:5f66%12]) with mapi; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:36:56 +0200
From: Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:36:50 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
Thread-Index: Ac6yPZXdYKJWLUpDQkSzf2jhbaTbdQAo30ag
Message-ID: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCD2D007FC54@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz>
References: <201309151800.r8FI09RB025998@irp-view13.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201309151800.r8FI09RB025998@irp-view13.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forwarded
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:37:04 -0000

Hi Guys,

I am planning on posting an update within a week addressing comments received in Berlin
such as rework the document a bit to make it more general and make scenarios 1 & 2
as examples of how the sharing can be implemented. Fixing the security section as well
as trying to address your comments raised in this wglc.

Cheers,
Ales

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred
> Baker
> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 8:00 PM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
> 
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-
> ietf-v6ops-64share.  Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor
> suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues,
> such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be
> addressed, please post your comments to the list.
> 
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as
> its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility,
> that is also an important comment to make.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email