IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Sun, 22 September 2013 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615D111E814B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pn2DhE8-I1ry for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22e.google.com (mail-ea0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6E411E8147 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z15so1295629ead.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=iMS2emxKPIufez6CQxo1DQjqY4G6T0QyTHSt+iF3Hiw=; b=lARumz+YY38I7oChBkqGzH0/sBLlOT/ja2FJ/23rzIaAVRDzy1N5pQ4uIuCCI73RZf Xd5IhVl/nyraNvvKgfiRbXF5yX79ApYnIgIUa0AjwdquCpmz61rUA5H8LZ0pdi4B6u9+ S8XmJ6Q5bo7HJWVcGU4zuBSdeI3qe07cYk5DX3kw/My/rvMlVTyt+SYNLlLTEUz6wegD kf4uBvBnRxCcVmJnGJpXQaelueF4ktcveLsFTFVMlFZezzhoJ+YArGz5ew8GFxpdBKKi pVOQE4EOhYrRY4vVkFsiNQCc+AnuYIT8r+hG41gh/SNPNX5WtdcOPHGCeprV6qBGL9ZM Qd8g==
X-Received: by 10.15.22.67 with SMTP id e43mr6322430eeu.47.1379879651836; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm36465181eeh.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309222034420.32315@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:54:09 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B421DC34-8A84-40FC-BE20-A8935CB7E5D1@gmail.com>
References: <5236a1bc.82a8700a.3a3f.ffffc0d8@mx.google.com> <1379541548.63737.YahooMailNeo@web142504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <AFAB9759B1DE4F4187483FC509B501990115CC3ACBF7@HE111490.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CABmgDzRGteFt1-s0V1qD1m9f7_aZHEXfmbYkD6Nv2xoXEz6EFQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309222034420.32315@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:54:13 -0000

On Sep 22, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Teemu Savolainen wrote:
> 
>> Secondly, I don't agree DHCP server support is required, as the CE can include the DNS addresses in RAs as specified in RFC6106.
> 
> There are very few products out there that supports this way of conveying DNS resolver information.
> 
> I am not opposed to say that providing basic 64share might skip supplying DNS resolver over IPv6, but then I agree with a few mail back where it was said we should have another document recommending how to get DNS resolver working for IPv6 only clients.

Why wouldn't we add this (rather obvious) requirement to draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile? That would basically be just a clarification to Req#10.

- Jouni



> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email