IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 23 September 2013 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5873611E817B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4GRH1bZSFop for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FB111E816E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9CEC49C; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F559A; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:55:13 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B421DC34-8A84-40FC-BE20-A8935CB7E5D1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309230453340.32315@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <5236a1bc.82a8700a.3a3f.ffffc0d8@mx.google.com> <1379541548.63737.YahooMailNeo@web142504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <AFAB9759B1DE4F4187483FC509B501990115CC3ACBF7@HE111490.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CABmgDzRGteFt1-s0V1qD1m9f7_aZHEXfmbYkD6Nv2xoXEz6EFQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309222034420.32315@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B421DC34-8A84-40FC-BE20-A8935CB7E5D1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:55:17 -0000

On Sun, 22 Sep 2013, Jouni Korhonen wrote:

>
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Teemu Savolainen wrote:
>>
>>> Secondly, I don't agree DHCP server support is required, as the CE can include the DNS addresses in RAs as specified in RFC6106.
>>
>> There are very few products out there that supports this way of conveying DNS resolver information.
>>
>> I am not opposed to say that providing basic 64share might skip supplying DNS resolver over IPv6, but then I agree with a few mail back where it was said we should have another document recommending how to get DNS resolver working for IPv6 only clients.
>
> Why wouldn't we add this (rather obvious) requirement to draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile? That would basically be just a clarification to Req#10.

Absolutely fine, draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile could be this 
"other document".

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email