IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr> Sun, 15 September 2013 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2236411E81C6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbukDHuMnZ4o for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4812611E81BE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8FKJuvV007389 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:19:56 +0300
Received: from MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.30]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8FKJu7A008611 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:19:56 +0300
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (194.219.240.252.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [194.219.240.252]) by MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8FKJos4022954; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:19:52 +0300
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=achatz@forthnetgroup.gr; spf=pass
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr header.from=achatz@forthnetgroup.gr; sender-id=pass
Message-ID: <52361667.2060201@forthnetgroup.gr>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:19:51 +0300
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <201309151800.r8FI09RB025998@irp-view13.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201309151800.r8FI09RB025998@irp-view13.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 20:20:07 -0000

Just a quick question...

I don't see any reference of DNS servers under 3.1, only MTU & Prefix.
Shouldn't there be a bullet showing that DNS info (UE address as DNS proxy, or original through-RA/DHCPv6 DNS servers) should also pass on the LAN link?

--
Tassos

Fred Baker wrote on 15/9/2013 21:00:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share.  Please read it now. If you find nits
> (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the
> authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a
> statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed,
> please post your comments to the list.
>
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
> comment to make.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email