IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Thu, 12 July 2012 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1368921F880E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EbV27Ywf9w1t for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D8521F87AA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=evyncke@cisco.com; l=1252; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342092002; x=1343301602; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=i4CukMFXGasOH1LOf7PouBr+TKPk6KsMKEo1rO/ZW30=; b=LW1P1XfIBlLy5JW4nVa83C5s5LPeNL3A0Z2IoeI6Ps2nn3uDe1rPyFdR N3dGWhBr2XZXsi7yEfRkOUpbccEoDekPpZh+tk7Fmz7wfXzmpmYrcZcni GFc5N2FvFG/x2GyMlJJg8QoHqXIPaA0upb2LzNi5/QOdCvByvTXKCszWq w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EANux/k+tJXHB/2dsb2JhbABFt3iBB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BWwsMBAIBCBEEAQELHQcnCxQJCAIEAQ0FCAEZh2sLnUugH4tAFIUIYAOIFptEgWaCX4FW
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,573,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="100963030"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2012 11:20:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6CBK1F0017445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:20:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.178]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 06:20:01 -0500
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHNUnbpWFu7FKUfJEyvobkjy/vWXZcjFqiAgAHweICAAJM6cA==
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:20:00 +0000
Message-ID: <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E10475CC@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com> <45F1DB32-74F6-4E4A-88E2-118B76A5F474@cisco.com> <49128AF1-1EF0-478B-B5E1-2B5A73AFE1A3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <49128AF1-1EF0-478B-B5E1-2B5A73AFE1A3@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.185.70]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19034.006
x-tm-as-result: No--30.572600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "lee.howard@twcable.com" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>, "victor.kuarsingh@rci.rogers.com" <victor.kuarsingh@rci.rogers.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:19:30 -0000

Fred and Joel,

As several authors of draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00 will be in Vancouver, can we have a slot at one V6OPS WG meeting to present our I-D? It has got some discussions on the list in June so there is indeed interest (and I agree with Brian this may be too ambitious and could be limited to a RFC roadmap for beginners).

Thanks a lot in advance

Regards

-éric

PS: and I understand that, once again, we are late.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: mercredi 11 juillet 2012 23:28
> To: v6ops@ietf.org WG
> Cc: Ron Bonica
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
> 
> I have uploaded a preliminary agenda, at
>     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/agenda/agenda-84-v6ops
> 
> I have put the drafts that I identified as clearly appropriate on Thursday,
> and the "unclear" on Friday. Those who object to the latter set are free to
> leave Thursday evening :-) We should have at least half an hour per draft
> for discussion.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email