IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F274F21F8639 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0Bstug5CMfQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566CE21F8615 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=395; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1340718875; x=1341928475; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ENT04t5he6/zG9ovn4GCYoAn4QrQNVgI17D1kDbRrao=; b=P7h+uB9INbxINowUxL8wUJmwTKbkgBD1ohQvUye5WOr8pnMdffQFtFFu 2nEM6myYy3aP4KyOwqawT+wP/qRoibRL6H5lOUNh8sZGBr09Pq15wJnTg Npx3aFs6S3g3sRAQG7sIIinJjInZ8joMlCA4lIF/qo3RrqAd7K+qVS0du 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAKG+6U+tJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFtjKBB4IYAQEBAwESASc/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOJ4dkBZhjoEOLN4YEA5Uyjh2BZoJf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,477,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="96091243"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2012 13:54:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5QDsVQM007438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:54:31 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.234]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:31 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHNUnbpWFu7FKUfJEyvobkjy/vWXQ==
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:54:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D3DA7A64-A76F-4F66-B8DD-81913186603C@cisco.com>
References: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com> <017901cd538a$e9af8980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <017901cd538a$e9af8980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.79.230]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-18996.004
x-tm-as-result: No--28.185400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1CC86BE12EF22742983F00121ED523E8@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<v6ops@ietf.org>" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:54:36 -0000

On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:00 PM, t.petch wrote:

> There was a lively discussion in May which left a number of issues
> unclear for me, and I see that, today, a new version has arrived, so I
> think that further discussion should ensue, preferrably on the list.

Happy to have list discussion, and if my AD tells me it's a v6ops item, at IETF 84. That discussion may happen in sunset4.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email