IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23E911E80D0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47UvptpO6Hj3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB8A11E80CB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=360; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342042121; x=1343251721; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=td+xFNvVolx6VWYTAMpP8B6IoTD0kL+GanNbpW8BMQM=; b=YrSDYso23imRsCzBnvT7LmThRJpuRP2wGVnGD8fdq2PnUDerLiap0Fyq RfnyNPq3183goRG1tm+hQ+8eiNurWLoG2BrjQqaZTNL/M/Oj9AduEc5/B kijGXjvJcFwqpQFPgZwn4WddFStjucjXacjA8YzzvxnIqV/fH2Go2rXAW Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EABDv/U+tJXG8/2dsb2JhbABFt3GBB4IhAQEEEgEnPxACAQg2EDIlAgQODhmHawudPqAfkE5gA5U6jiCBZoJf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,569,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="100973056"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2012 21:28:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6BLSX6g017313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:28:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.118]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:28:33 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHNUnbpWFu7FKUfJEyvobkjy/vWXZcjFqiAgAHweIA=
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:28:03 +0000
Message-ID: <49128AF1-1EF0-478B-B5E1-2B5A73AFE1A3@cisco.com>
References: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com> <45F1DB32-74F6-4E4A-88E2-118B76A5F474@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45F1DB32-74F6-4E4A-88E2-118B76A5F474@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.126.156]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19034.001
x-tm-as-result: No--28.065100-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <64D298C73D050845BF527BFF2A41A126@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:28:10 -0000

I have uploaded a preliminary agenda, at
    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/agenda/agenda-84-v6ops

I have put the drafts that I identified as clearly appropriate on Thursday, and the "unclear" on Friday. Those who object to the latter set are free to leave Thursday evening :-) We should have at least half an hour per draft for discussion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email