[v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A98A21F8630 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQQr4OnQbaft for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A8721F85DD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2142; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1340589916; x=1341799516; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ukZu5z49CR4lZCthW7BYlS1pWGM//58TB+2/ZbznE40=; b=AIxeSrb9FTXS+cDT4m+Cyw3bAkJa/F2PDYiY5bNglIJ9uyPMDuL4/0DW ATVF9sb0vQomu2gLp6rkur8bsgFfaBGWysOLzjSj23bmkV8EjysPvs+3Z HYOSuQ1vk5J/HtXVuoVxCS10ZzCerwDHib2FrM9NxwNGRgP0nAuN+pVCH c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAALH50+tJV2b/2dsb2JhbABEtgCBB4IfDgQBJysUEgE+QicEDhkOh2mYe58EkFVgA5UujhuBZoJf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,468,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="95518208"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2012 02:04:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5P24sAF021145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:04:54 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.234]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:04:54 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHNUnbpWFu7FKUfJEyvobkjy/vWXQ==
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:04:53 +0000
Message-ID: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.70.231.59]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-18994.001
x-tm-as-result: No--38.652700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <98679CE35EFA7D4BB2BAC51E5FD09A6F@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:05:20 -0000

I sat down this morning to assess our agenda. Interested in working group comment.

# no update
Jan 11 16:48 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-pppoe-02.txt
Feb 21 18:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-04.txt
Feb 23 07:29 draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
Feb 25 11:37 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-01.txt
Feb 28 08:49 draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
Mar  5 17:46 draft-ma-v6ops-terminal-test-00.txt
Mar  7 07:33 draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-02.txt
Mar 12 06:21 draft-vanrein-v6ops-6bed4-01.txt
Mar 12 17:52 draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01.txt
Mar 12 21:34 draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis-02.txt
Mar 13 04:59 draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition-03.txt
Mar 30 03:27 draft-donley-v6ops-ce-router-design-00.txt
Mar 31 11:33 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-00.txt

#no expressed interest
Jun 20 11:33 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-02.txt
Apr 27 12:07 draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-01.txt

#out of charter
Jun 24 07:59 draft-generic-v6ops-tunmtu-07.txt
May 10 11:44 draft-templin-v6ops-isops-17.txt

#in IESG queue
May 30 11:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-04.txt
May 17 11:02 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09.txt


#WGLC in v6ops or move to sunset4; awaiting AD direction
May  8 10:14 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt

#potential for agenda
Apr 30 13:58 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-04.txt
May 16 02:12 draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-06.txt
May 22 21:30 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt

#for agenda, perhaps ready for last call
Jun 12 19:26 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-01.txt



For draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address, the last discussion was in April, and we were to expect an update. If that happens, I expect to bring that to the agenda. 

Lee asked about draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 on the list, but I see no update and I wasn't clear on the list commentary, whether the operators want to discuss. 

There is still, of course, time for folks to post -00 drafts (until 9 July); if there is list discussion of those drafts, we will include them in the agenda.