IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-01

"stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com> Wed, 28 June 2017 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF69129B31 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, REPTO_QUOTE_YAHOO=0.646, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dB4TUWgBY191 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic309-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic309-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869B6127601 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1498665246; bh=T9YAGyL7foD3jlRkGL1FRrukzt7fY4PqaPSUOwqB93U=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=ZeoXdHO5YdRWrKsfoMpk5yF0i6OrxLZGFqCFEU5nxdmOKEsDG5z1r6XN0ZSuCfsI9y104+lChzFzXlUQwWKgN0L+1nI8YhAWUMKHW2h/TJbZ0bWtx0Ah1CkXOn3iGZj6Uh0JX9BDY7Uluob7vyvS9v5QQM74VClAd5nh2lCOnCNSea6KyZE2eTBIJHs6qNlDl3cHYOAkeVjGJwsZGrm+bZMoCXTtlFcjGqOP8pzGlupxXjxsunb3xD/490vV69049reazqpNbtzXcS03/0o44RlZI2AmFlgPde62nPDIOAef03i27n2IxP4hryfZKHvv8ogLyIX4Y2cqEGCikDqk5w==
X-YMail-OSG: bgGj6oMVM1mPpPYjbIQs0yJODvIS_j5yymxCx5ZyN5KJ2x2.Mp5Ux01WRcK5zwZ XlkY3qzIQfJE5nnRffkAEx22BEiNRvKrV7PoXfQsEP.lC6gdSjTWz6pPPcfy4yMYL1ttBT1Hj4RY W3Njp2bhFPLRrV8WSiFFuFpCzgqIzw3.n2ymOTBNkIDmkgPwjfMWF2n7Jsbe6A1G80it_BqLU5hk Dpytb315M82gdICB5NPl1xT7yZIKj6yE8glp3bHa59mNMVlO7kj9e55CiNgAT4YAy4GKtR96h2vH 7wi0zQRA.G8NjG.TAXzBZqgZD.MbxKbU.NB27hThHemOpyLvVWRV6i_1HU86_QNPABlltzj3WfGO XO.GGwwsjQB3vfWpDfISoLDT_EvSmyVTv.85YT6BvcMhFapFxzE7Lsq6AeaiKgcz1.VO_xyyA0iB ORNsl3iVZbyO7XynMRgD7W0Q9VWgz.eMkweSIbrwe6GuWjCXaE6CkNcBphYCyOfedKZq_cPg1IuK Oazb4JWA1SGfKSAwnIfWUulLlwk29amY8scdcFJvpew--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:54:06 +0000
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:54:05 +0000
From: "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <546799735.505039.1498665245952@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6F787DF-E3FA-4C79-A6DC-5D17EBDCCBD5@apple.com>
References: <149670589074.3841.10812713591494006570@ietfa.amsl.com> <C22244D7-ABF6-430B-8155-8D4C1C1382DF@apple.com> <FA0D06E7-47F9-4029-81D4-2D96BFDD5576@consulintel.es> <65F3C8F4-6533-4C15-83F9-64AFC0EFFA79@apple.com> <4AC6726C-142E-48E5-95CF-2C3AD3331441@consulintel.es> <738488839.469942.1498664001646@mail.yahoo.com> <B6F787DF-E3FA-4C79-A6DC-5D17EBDCCBD5@apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_505038_1862551051.1498665245950"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9978 YahooMailNeo Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/59.0.3071.86 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UGZaK1XdrbWzRcJJFH2pQlO6Sw0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:54:09 -0000

Hi David,
Yes I have. 464XLAT or anything else is not required to be able to run DNS64/NAT64. You can run DNS64/NAT64 in combination with Dual Stack if you want to. 
/S

      From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
 To: "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com> 
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
 Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:37 AM
 Subject: Re: Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-01
   
Hi Stephan,
Have you read the rest of that section that details the changes required on client devices?

Thanks,
David Schinazi

On Jun 28, 2017, at 08:33, "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com> wrote:


Hi David,
Thanks for adding the Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section, I find it useful. However I don't think the below sentence from this section is accurate. I can't think of any changes that are needed on a client device to run NAT64/DNS64. 
While many IPv6 transition protocols have been standardized and   deployed, most are transparent to client devices.  The combined use   of NAT64 [RFC6146] and DNS64 [RFC6147] is a popular solution that is   being deployed and requires changes in client devices.
Thanks, Stephan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email