IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-01

"stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com> Thu, 29 June 2017 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ADD127698 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, REPTO_QUOTE_YAHOO=0.646, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FiSNPi-Ow-Iy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic324-23.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic324-23.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.187.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7272B12706D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1498706509; bh=c40/kJN/CX6voQYai27UFoBm+1wKwFUAQlJs4sFZ5kE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=RLHbUkC3DxH5oj4BsbXw8jJTik0B95LPKupLEqkDYVElu7YJE6J47a4fBNldEeYFCkCKP34Tjp42X/uTUSOKEwovf4XEdS961NEN7e0D2z39UNyjYGWlLLNFe6c4jT2gtKQ5VULw9rz1g2ezxxcqLU+w0rGzCLHhIvtXKNbGiZ/Fw2naGRDOjb9V46HbNgq4TiDA+bbz0z2Ecg1jpFzq4q5l2ACGktC5CqkhxJnxo/jhWIR0cwSUxWIYfxfIadWPW1zRAnJvUpDSvGN3zRCVR71t0ZAxolSZwar20HF7ylWbqhSjnT1me4mlyU1LyAeXKm8sq1Qdr7Q5erKNPMNDFQ==
X-YMail-OSG: hAYOXMEVM1mKjJtbnj8.apWsZBCU86Z.GtCyuW1JBNkhrKdl6ZG9F_yNVhWJKmA nV.Cb3loMskndUvwGXb54CRSHjiSglBKd2ObWebn20__ETdtgmTssZWMmSU8_08CdRJSHM6xn7qn XdBCuMoMC2K9tOuuRcVx3C16joYUUkO0bXC0WL7FNtS3fSFQsa7MZ3SZC02r5mdlKcjFBQvkiOI7 7b2z6j2lWJxtyzgpzVNrVBZ4QScRiJsb_SUPMI03zKkivuiAUJA8B1MKUdEBff63K4g.NA6xqv7. zqaQvleJddCCgijcCVfU..g7m72kWeP3mAUZ4gOVWQIb8yTEqzvDf6q98A5dK0sDywLlEQ0GS1Ft LRJa8w8mRYJELKkMQ8rhWiHyntx.3_BPjAzcNlOn.Rbx2Np2RLR0lZAPpaJFMZYhpshDB66fnCAj W6MyGEiB9SEMULqVEH8FwmLnFh0knPaxt.g9ZezMCUglYg5S1ElCb4lC6WKvv2pcO0JiY8Ta5cVO YX7EPrqwQBY15qwZiXtRcA_b4UcCzwFZM.KcrPjqsXNUuv4RPTOrnnRNURLtgbUIzZd9DzA--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic324.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:21:49 +0000
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:21:27 +0000
From: "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: "stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com" <stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <361897988.912329.1498706487973@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706290236110.18195@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <149670589074.3841.10812713591494006570@ietfa.amsl.com> <C22244D7-ABF6-430B-8155-8D4C1C1382DF@apple.com> <FA0D06E7-47F9-4029-81D4-2D96BFDD5576@consulintel.es> <65F3C8F4-6533-4C15-83F9-64AFC0EFFA79@apple.com> <4AC6726C-142E-48E5-95CF-2C3AD3331441@consulintel.es> <738488839.469942.1498664001646@mail.yahoo.com> <B6F787DF-E3FA-4C79-A6DC-5D17EBDCCBD5@apple.com> <546799735.505039.1498665245952@mail.yahoo.com> <A15C4444-B457-40B8-BCC0-3C40A4F1E3AA@apple.com> <222564725.789104.1498690743587@mail.yahoo.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706290236110.18195@uplift.swm.pp.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_912328_490021675.1498706487971"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9978 YahooMailNeo Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/54.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sCCFYhk0oguEi7ZvyJi3VPS9fL4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Supporting IPv6-only Networks with NAT64 and DNS64 section of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:21:52 -0000

Hi Mikael,

>        Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, stephan.lagerholm@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Fair enough, the Dual stack example is not applicable in this
>> section. I'm hung up that the draft says that it requires changes on in
>> client devices because it contradicts RFC 6174 section 2 that says that
>> current IPv6 nodes can use this mechanism without requiring any
>> modifications. 
>
>
> But that doesn't mean applications running on those IPv6 nodes can access
> IPv4 literals. If the node also implements a CLAT, then it can.

This section of the rfc6555bis draft is addressing "platforms that do not support 464XLAT" so no CLAT here. 
But we are on the same page, I'm happy that the authors are addressing the IPv6 only use case and are extending HE to support that case too. 

/Stephan





   

|  | Virus-free. www.avg.com  |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email