IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on the NAT66 draft

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 11 November 2008 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4AA3A68D4 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:58:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.337, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBj+NPIXNX9p for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F24B3A6861 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Kzo3Q-000BSp-NJ for v6ops-data@psg.com; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:52:52 +0000
Received: from [195.30.1.100] (helo=moebius2.Space.Net) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <gert@Space.Net>) id 1Kzo3K-000BRu-5a for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:52:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 81213 invoked by uid 1007); 11 Nov 2008 07:52:43 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=i9230loxwOGBzKIBWj1+IY6xqvqxTZjxcERFLFA0GxNYwUv3RcW/HVCqv3hGXK4w ;
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:52:43 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Cc: Eric Klein <EricLKlein@softhome.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Comments on the NAT66 draft
Message-ID: <20081111075243.GW89033@Space.Net>
References: <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03014762B5@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <courier.4912CE09.00003CB8@softhome.net> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03014765AF@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <6BB0BB30-7AA4-4821-B9EB-4703794F3C87@muada.com> <courier.4914868B.00003F53@softhome.net> <9937716B-A667-4FB6-8337-9596AD356901@muada.com> <courier.4917F518.00002B4D@softhome.net> <20081110143243.GI89033@Space.Net> <courier.491852A1.000070E6@softhome.net> <1568D893-1DC9-48CF-A04A-F2B55F31E416@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1568D893-1DC9-48CF-A04A-F2B55F31E416@apple.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:24:20PM -0800, james woodyatt wrote:
> My response to that concern is that any organization too  
> small to win a PI allocation [..]

Just to clarify this: the problem with PI is not that it's hard to get
- the problem with PI in its current form (i.e.: "BGP routed, non -
aggregateable") is that it puts a burden on all ISP routers out there.

In IPv6, "address space wastage" is much less of a problem than in IPv4 -
but "routing table slots" could be a much more serious issue.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email