IETF Logo Mail Archive

The renumbering problem [Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on the NAT66 draft]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 17 November 2008 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3353A686B for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:36:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgZZcWQSMqUt for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C27C3A684C for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1L1uo6-0007nV-S4 for v6ops-data@psg.com; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:29:46 +0000
Received: from [209.85.198.227] (helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>) id 1L1uo0-0007mO-Dx for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:29:42 +0000
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so2310587rvf.41 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:29:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pPikeLlNvxFG/iTFx/QBg6oJ7Rs/Mk+hjjKaezLBhBQ=; b=DsgTrUnLJE9IoD9iey8n4vE7e9o1YmXgfrkE8jRzCEUEqvRRFY5B96wyfvuEOgr2l/ mLqFyAUqs8CbVv5TE3pfJmR+P7axhX/Av6fh8zWBoy0A2atF6Ad1Wfp1mrXh3PhzUV1j RyrUdnHKGOR0jUSDK8HK+bi6rjR0BbAyScuT0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=JujvkDcg0h3ofPNxLpq/J0SnqCJyGWSllNZvbJxHnYFYAKThris0K51+0NeZj+ve0D QqYEpIMppvcfCslzDlX4wR+mlGfMJnxNf1JEoQO993ZfH4yYIkLnMrE601eoHfC1Lnqr i52zAqzOGCFRVSv4JdIkK7Oj6a/ZWW+Kih/lU=
Received: by 10.141.88.3 with SMTP id q3mr1996408rvl.54.1226892580066; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm8339137rvb.1.2008.11.16.19.29.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4920E51C.7070007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:29:32 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
CC: Eric Klein <EricLKlein@softhome.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: The renumbering problem [Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on the NAT66 draft]
References: <4911B9E7.8090108@free.fr> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03014762B5@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <courier.4912CE09.00003CB8@softhome.net> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03014765AF@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <6BB0BB30-7AA4-4821-B9EB-4703794F3C87@muada.com> <courier.4914868B.00003F53@softhome.net> <9937716B-A667-4FB6-8337-9596AD356901@muada.com> <courier.4917F518.00002B4D@softhome.net> <20081110143243.GI89033@Space.Net> <courier.491852A1.000070E6@softhome.net> <1568D893-1DC9-48CF-A04A-F2B55F31E416@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <1568D893-1DC9-48CF-A04A-F2B55F31E416@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On 2008-11-11 11:24, james woodyatt wrote:
...
> That said, I'm not impressed by the arguments put forward by the
> opponents of RFC 4864 local network protection who, in my view, are
> greatly exaggerating the seriousness of the network renumbering
> problem.   

James, and anyone else who is still able to focus on this thread:

Please read draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt and send
comments and suggestions to its authors.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email