Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion - address out of the delegated prefix, on the egress - no DAD

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B14B1A8927 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:15:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly_lEkPF6gfG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.184.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A791B2C2C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id tA37Ff1N056308; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:15:41 -0700
Received: from XCH-PHX-109.sw.nos.boeing.com (xch-phx-109.sw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.36]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id tA37Fct3056142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:15:39 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.14]) by XCH-PHX-109.sw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.9.155]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:15:38 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion - address out of the delegated prefix, on the egress - no DAD
Thread-Index: AQHRFgdwer7XUB2060uOBZVAXvxlBw==
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:15:38 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F39A3F@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <8D175A1F-B1AE-44B4-838E-1C853B6C937D@cisco.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F391A7@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr15C-uoxUw0kgWO-d=LmUK8qWGLS7vt+22W+k8xXtDY+g@mail.gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F393F1@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F3941D@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5638223E.5090404@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr219s7o7-koDg+DarUFB_KVkcfYM4YZVsHD67gdPeY-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr219s7o7-koDg+DarUFB_KVkcfYM4YZVsHD67gdPeY-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F39A3FXCHBLV504nwnosb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/eeZE6i4_JKv4eUMHOJibQVgttb8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion - address out of the delegated prefix, on the egress - no DAD
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:15:59 -0000

Hi Lorenzo,

From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Colitti
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 7:04 PM
To: Alexandre Petrescu
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion - address out of the delegated prefix, on the egress - no DAD

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com<mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
Le 03/11/2015 10:31, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Bumping up one level – is it clear to everyone that it is OK to
assign addresses taken from a DHCPv6 delegated prefix to the interface over which the
prefix was received? And, that DAD is not required for those addresses?

Is this a statement we need to make in this draft, though?

FLT>>> I think so. An opportunity for DAD avoidance when we are talking about
FLT>>> configuring huge numbers of addresses seems like a significant advantage.