IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 18 February 2014 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC11A05ED; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:43:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVPD9v2zT7ix; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5A31A05EB; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1WFcX7-00038T-8F; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 04:43:49 +0000
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:43:46 +0800
Message-ID: <m27g8tt4hp.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Fan, Peng" <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <009e01cf2b8b$26a43d20$73ecb760$@chinamobile.com>
References: <12AA6714-4BBE-4ACE-8191-AA107D04FBF4@cisco.com> <m2wqgyjifd.wl%randy@psg.com> <006801cf2b34$22837cd0$678a7670$@chinamobile.com> <m2a9dqfr6k.wl%randy@psg.com> <009e01cf2b8b$26a43d20$73ecb760$@chinamobile.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/n6NFzBEYzyeM1YBFDHnfLXPihE4
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>, 'V6 Ops List' <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 04:44:00 -0000

> Just to clarify. I am not complaining we cannot assign the unique integers,
> but the integers require additional planning

but 32 bit integers should require only 1/4 the planning as 128 bit
integers :)

you allocate v4/v6 addresses hierarchically.  so take 240/whatever and
allocate using the same system.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email