Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier

"" <> Tue, 18 February 2014 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5687A1A02DA; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:51:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.375
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PV8bRZ6zS4ib; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with SMTP id 630AB1A0309; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown[]) by rmmx-oa_allagent01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee15302ca3514f-f314f; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:49:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee15302ca3514f-f314f
Received: from lizhenqiang (unknown[]) by rmsmtp-oa_rmapp01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee15302ca357b8-15a94; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:49:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee15302ca357b8-15a94
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:51:37 +0800
From: "" <>
To: "Randy Bush" <>
References: <>, <>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 0, 108[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart260276176335_=----"
Cc: 'idr wg' <>, 'V6 Ops List' <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:51:43 -0000

Tell me please the large provider that you know has his own automatic configuration tools. I would like to contact him to learn from him.
 From: Randy BushDate: 2014-02-18 10:40To: lizhenqiang@chinamobile.comCC: fanpeng; 'idr wg'; 'V6 Ops List'; 'Robert Raszuk'Subject: Re: [Idr] [v6ops] BGP Identifier> Do you have such tools to config your network? Or do you know the
> vendor that provide such tools?Indeed, such programmatic generation
> tools are good for network plan. But the logic in the tools is
> complecated especially for a very large network with hierarchical
> operation as Peng Fan mentioned.
there are products in the space, but the large providers i know who
configure programatically developed their own.  there are not enough
large providers not suffering from 'not invented here' to make a
reasonable customer base for serious software development.
but it pays for itself, so smart folk who develop it.