IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop

KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com> Sat, 27 October 2012 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB6821F8644 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IbROsoyu70g5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B08821F84E3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u46so2102998wey.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=x2jZyp3AXGZ2cACA3lwoho7tFzVokoDTeNgXDB5MN5E=; b=hTTGrRd+uGlYjuU5piUBgYEZM4kxRh9YUgxTUTcaXZ7ceDkNC+cbV1EtHxKJ8t2UoV 7GlgM3zSXt1YDv7cu+ERvH6Se3eROohRKyHQHxniuHFldVz/XKdtkOra7yVEG7+BlpdT Dz2VVLez4OaTFPETma2zeIkIafjnoDuoLUQ1b7/mp3Eo3iXx9BUguzuCa6Q0OMdFVuZN FOI7Qf0QX0FJGJSMMfNuTDczUqFOngM6PhYC51zqyomWYlwuWIMLXTdrwqNmK0PVeRK4 k1697+RTiKOIByQTMGVv5liNd7hSEzYQgosqMwo7y0e9k6a47ys52h4Nzg0rQdE4e182 P/sg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.96.129 with SMTP id ds1mr9498344wib.17.1351369127812; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.231.211 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1xDC7BefRyaHHKfw9THRkyQWwHS5P05_uWTOV539uS2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201210161245.q9GCj0i26478@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0DEDF3A2@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <507DA6A3.20807@inex.ie> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0DEDF3C3@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <507DAB13.2010704@inex.ie> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0DEDF3CE@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <507DDF8A.9010607@inex.ie> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0DEDF5AB@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <BB219517-B488-4777-AE9C-35C57BE91263@kumari.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210171337470.7337@shell4.bayarea.net> <AC530E99-4054-4B0A-9B5C-30F9EF4A530C@kumari.net> <20121018223121.28B2C2A0041D@drugs.dv.isc.org> <50812F87.5000107@inex.ie> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65E0DF5C66F@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5085319B.60707@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr2qDsM6cCPapRmKuWw7SG-cuMd9PuiBD7ineqj7Bp4+Xw@mail.gmail.com> <8C4093E0-4031-4057-9B96-3738A5A48D2D@merike.com> <1351154487.78754.YahooMailNeo@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <CAKD1Yr1xDC7BefRyaHHKfw9THRkyQWwHS5P05_uWTOV539uS2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:18:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+iP7bUeRoCkFhZK4x_xHj6u42a0jbOzbyEF55h7QdUdrN5rMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044282a0d2dc8404cd102420"
Cc: V6 Ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:18:53 -0000

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:

> As always, the danger in trying to reach consensus on a controversial
> topic is that of endlessly discussing the issue, which makes it impossible
> to make a useful contribution to it. The way I see it, if we can't reach
> consensus, it's better to punt entirely and at least issue a statement
> about the issues. At least we will have done something useful. If we get
> deadlocked forever in trying to decide what the right thing to do is, we
> will get nothing useful done at all.
>
>

+1

IMHO, it would be naive to ignore operational reality. It is better to
document the current state-of-affairs and let the rest of the community
make informed decisions based on this information.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email