[v6ops] ODP: new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
Czerwonka Michał - Hurt TP <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 11:34 UTC
Return-Path: <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E409211E80DF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.386
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhofAnad4k+F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailin.tpsa.pl (mailout.tpsa.pl [212.160.172.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B7D11E80DC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10.236.62.153 (EHLO OPE10HT05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet) ([10.236.62.153]) by mailin.tpsa.pl (MOS 3.10.10a-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DZL92465; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Czerwonka Michał - Hurt TP <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
To: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
Thread-Index: AQHOfKI8X61wIhyu9k636KHEY2pjHJl6OO6AgAFsNxA=
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:33:54 +0000
Message-ID: <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F1E311@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
References: <201307091245.r69Cj0Q08784@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <CAD6AjGSPgs8JzN7yuPUVSr1Pz5POY6JsMo0_33zK3Kn++RxBBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSPgs8JzN7yuPUVSr1Pz5POY6JsMo0_33zK3Kn++RxBBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: pl-PL
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mailin.tpsa.pl
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090206.51F65324.0016, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-09 01:15:44, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Mirapoint-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090206.51F65324.0016, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-09 01:15:44, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 65bb3c5969f1fc8e5841b645bfd44224
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [v6ops] ODP: new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:34:07 -0000
+1 NO IPv6 in roaming :( BR, Mcz -----Wiadomość oryginalna----- Od: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] W imieniu cb.list6 Wysłano: 28 lipca 2013 17:48 Do: Fred Baker DW: IPv6 Ops WG; draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis@tools.ietf.org Temat: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis As general feedback 1. As others have noted, it is important to clarify that home routed is the default case and local-breakout is only relavent for IMS, but IMS based roaming and local breakout is yet to see its first deployment, and may still be years in the future for roaming to work this way. So, local breakout is not a real case and seems to be causing more confusion. 2. There is a hazard in assuming the well known prefix is always available. Any device should not assume the well known prefix is available. This is essentially a misconfiguration that should not occur. 3. What i have learned a. dual-stack 2 PDP will never work, charging issues in the billing system, and too much capacity wasted for no real gain b. dual-stack 1 PDP (v4v6) will not work any time soon. Enabling this feature in the HSS/HLR breaks roaming and there is no way to ensure this issue is fixed in the hundreds of networks that are potentially impacted. There are some backs to do on the home network that can make this easier but not exposing partner networks to the new release 8 features. c. What does work and adds value (saves IPv4 address for the common case of not-roaming) : IPv6-only single PDP 464XLAT on the home network, IPv4-only single PDP when roaming. This is how i am moving forward. The when at home, the UE has default configs for ipv6-only and when roaming the ue only attempts to connect using IPv4. This gets the vast majority of users in my home network off v4 and keeps ipv4 for the complicated yet relatively small percentage of roaming users. On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:45 AM, <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > > A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis. Please take a look at it and comment. > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-… fred
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Alexis Munoz (Gmail)
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-… fred
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GT RAMIREZ, Medel G.
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… david.binet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… holger.metschulat
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- [v6ops] ODP: new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roa… Czerwonka Michał - Hurt TP
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… GangChen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Heatley, Nick
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roam… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)