IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] handling STS header field extendability

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 27 August 2012 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A32921F8512 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdCPpynMrIID for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9896921F8501 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.108] (50-1-50-97.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RLCrUM049955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:12:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <C4EDA5AF-D958-4FE3-AFF9-35C76E56F1C1@checkpoint.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:12:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F542467E-1F59-460F-9FCC-64132A2857F6@vpnc.org>
References: <503279FA.5070304@KingsMountain.com> <503BD234.5030509@KingsMountain.com> <503BD617.3000607@gondrom.org> <C4EDA5AF-D958-4FE3-AFF9-35C76E56F1C1@checkpoint.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
Cc: "websec@ietf.org" <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] handling STS header field extendability
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:13:12 -0000

On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> wrote:

> With no hats: let's not choose a policy for a registry that we are not setting up, especially since we're not even sure that it's ever going to be set up.
> 
> We can leave it to the first extension document to set up the registry and policy. If that document ever comes.

+1

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email