IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 25 March 2020 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440203A0408; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXYOMZnnjY0z; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAADF3A0363; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9A43897F; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0714E68; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, manycouches@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting
In-Reply-To: <F026A8A5-D6DB-4639-815F-AB2E96D42AE2@nostrum.com>
References: <6CF30D21-30B8-41B2-9DBD-12276A7349B4@nostrum.com> <31012.1585073861@localhost> <FE35AEFC-F92F-48ED-B517-883EE8BD2944@nostrum.com> <26960.1585088537@localhost> <F026A8A5-D6DB-4639-815F-AB2E96D42AE2@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:46:16 -0400
Message-ID: <29552.1585179976@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/ML8l-g6PVIXqg_TcQPvqW5MbBMM>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:46:28 -0000

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
    >> I think that everyone should use the webrtc version if they can.

    > I know the local client usually works from my house. I have not found
    > the WebRTC client as reliable. As chairs, our first concern was to try
    > to make the meeting run smoothly.

So, to be clear, it's okay for the chairs to have a system that others can't use?

If the webrtc version doesn't work for you, then maybe we shouldn't use this
donated product, for which we have an unclear SLA.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email