IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 25 March 2020 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162F53A09B7 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.404
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.404 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.274, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Huzdh-r2zXcC for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4FA3A09B0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.239] (mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02P3ENuj002248 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:14:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1585106065; bh=GZ0Ipl3qt87Do82Oj5gzS8jTxB9rm+3uJTuzX1/T9cw=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=oOHawJXUnOcTzPUPwc6HHSBYP8Zu3A3mTaTCtMRD93pEA/kBSF7NG2t6ncWHclG7B vwYyv5AgIqWLCHPfcNxIy983O0CtbPabMMUw7H1bn1OM/bbAMhW979cCWpIt/7WoYf T2+jdSoQuCKDG2/5HkZVzCKraA7xjhhpt/cf8Nng=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged) claimed to be [192.168.127.239]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <3190C93D-611A-42C3-9AE2-2BA95135A684@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8AF127FF-5803-4996-A05A-D3ED4653FCCC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:14:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <D758D942-F4C3-4F2C-A70D-76EC918D4DF8@cisco.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <6CF30D21-30B8-41B2-9DBD-12276A7349B4@nostrum.com> <CAOdDvNpCRqecjaN+iTR-mDemxUBJ5Uj_KVTTnToNRzAhjt5WSg@mail.gmail.com> <751E67A2-306D-4A2B-845B-7E846956E3BB@ericsson.com> <E63FF0CD-82B0-4F5A-B0F6-F9BAF1CEB49D@nostrum.com> <1A195DBC-4BD8-41CC-BE81-8EDA14D06493@ericsson.com> <D758D942-F4C3-4F2C-A70D-76EC918D4DF8@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/UZ-oZd088Xq2Js2925q-g8V9HSY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:14:50 -0000


> On Mar 24, 2020, at 10:10 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <mzanaty@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> hi On Mar 24, 2020, at 12:29 PM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> ...Yes. And, yesterday there weren't too many speakers to begin with. The situation would have been different if we e.g., would have discussed mandatory-to-impalement video codecs...
> 
> 
> Mandatory impalement is highly controversial.
> 

Mo, you were there for the codec wars. You know what they are like :-)

(I really don’t know if Christer typoed that)

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email