IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 24 March 2020 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030FE3A0DE6; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOcwWzRKkpej; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38CC3A0E04; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC34338982; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:16:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D18716D; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, manycouches@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DISPATCH Virtual Meeting
In-Reply-To: <6CF30D21-30B8-41B2-9DBD-12276A7349B4@nostrum.com>
References: <6CF30D21-30B8-41B2-9DBD-12276A7349B4@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:17:41 -0400
Message-ID: <31012.1585073861@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/fMn07ZH109-mnYtmRU3-nSF9cZM>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:17:51 -0000

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
    > There was a lot of interesting side-discussion in the jabber chat—to
    > the point that I wonder if we can encourage more of it to make it into
    > the webex. I know that gets logged, and people can review it, but I
    > doubt it will be captured in institutional memory as well as the
    > minuted stuff.

txauth restricted *webex* chat to mic line.
So it would be better if we could be consistent across WGs in how we use it.
And the webex chat is really hard to use, has no memory after you reconnect,
and jumps around everytime someone writes to it.

    > We did get the occasional problem when a person forgot to mute. Overall
    > it wasn’t bad. We got an occasional side coversation, but the worst was
    > when someone has the session running on multiple devices with live
    > mikes. (The feedback from that is very…distinctive).

The chair/host role can mute people.

I'm surprised you had the enter/exit stuff turned on.
I wouldn't have done that for any big group, or any situation where people
might have to reconnect.

Did you rely on the webrtc version?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email