Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 30.10.2019 15:37, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
> ...
> If possible, I’m in favor of allowing <br> generally — it’s not 100%
> clear to me that we won’t ever need <br> in <title> or <name>.  To help

IMHO, we shouldn't modify the vocabulary unless it's either trivial, or
there is a compelling use case. I don't think this is the case here.

> move us along and get <br> allowed in the less contentious areas, I’m ok
> with using the other entities available to us in <title> and revisiting
> this topic as needed.

+1 (if by that you mean using NBSP to bind words together).

> Sidenote: I am concerned that the ability to update the v3 vocabulary in
> the future will be tough and time consuming, especially with the RSE’s
> departure.
> ...

At this point, I'd be very surprised if we had a consolidated,
documented, tested and reviewed V3 vocabulary by the end of the year. So
we should make sure that in the transition period, we'll be able to
continue to work on that.

Best regards, Julian