Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Paul,

On 2019-10-18 20:29, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 10/18/19 11:12 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>> So, how would you handle the first of my two examples in an earlier message
>> in this thread:  The title of my implementation notes draft, which requires
>> more than one line both in text, html and pdf rendering:
>> 
>>                       Implementation notes for RFC7991,
>>                      "The 'xml2rfc' Version 3 Vocabulary"
> 
> This question presupposes that where a title is broken in a
> particular rendering is important. RFCs 7792, 7794, and 7795 did not
> indicate any such importance in their discussion of titles. In
> particular, for the HTML rendering that most people focused on in the
> discussion that led to the v3 format, line breaks are explicitly
> unimportant because the rendering might be on a narrow screen. It
> sounds like this issue is being brought up despite the text in the
> relevant RFCs.

Yes, well, I'm bringing this issue up because I ran smack into it with
the title of my implementation notes draft.  In real life, I think there
are cases where indicating a particular break point makes sense.  To me,
it is that simple.


	Henrik