Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [xml2rfc] [Rfc-markdown] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 09 October 2019 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D461312004D for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nOKfsVOFBFme for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8CF120019 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1570600702; bh=4KTVqYKTWKngyVw38a3h+0iaNrN684/wlFxUl2y4tlg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=T/UJCV9mSaAQvcsKe1nDHkh6Y7Pa+HwDLrbEMiHMiv5HPRAjAgemKNA+TYD+UOB52 Ud/mFuZRHP5y7dyTGvO5npKLOQzWmaCnkXnhhW5yX2UWrJ0yCMs9yfU0JnEbJxxNk3 MWFk8HaEhg02fAWyQH8U1JZ7/rtbRFTogY1yQz9I=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.145.63]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPokD-1iVSyD0SG3-00Msju; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:58:22 +0200
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
References: <E1iGMu9-00055y-Ui@durif.tools.ietf.org> <8304e61d-c550-91ea-9e23-eef2cd31240b@gmx.de> <A3513970-EEB0-4DBD-9E6F-A87EBFAF886D@att.com> <de4feaff-8f71-cd38-545c-2d848749251b@levkowetz.com> <f00a671a-6fe4-f5ae-2582-0b78ffa1c256@gmx.de> <1f18382c-d830-b887-f5d3-3f376ae4fdd7@gmx.de> <B15F7AF0-F5A0-401A-9F6E-F7E0E466B6A7@amsl.com> <f4f1b7ba-127a-fbfa-531b-eeff03814281@gmx.de> <71bc8d39-d06c-d900-cc8e-04a48218d75f@gmail.com> <0905DADC-E9D5-47A7-B610-F8A62686D2BD@att.com> <07DBAE10-D1FA-45C4-B7A2-321B265CA302@amsl.com> <c88388ff-84ae-c5f5-e093-e9aee77da3d6@levkowetz.com> <5f467e5a-200f-e7fd-94d6-8b04d863c7e2@icann.org> <b3c2d77e-d28e-3b3e-8fe7-88c91104410d@levkowetz.com> <cfdfe489-8a37-7792-35d4-8ae244fbce0d@icann.org> <0d0efd73-f8ba-4a05-eafb-4fd56e25869d@levkowetz.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <d35b39f7-3f1c-9b1d-1566-0b3ea61bef50@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:58:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0d0efd73-f8ba-4a05-eafb-4fd56e25869d@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:2NNKcTmH4g1GUWwsrEBh7EUprMoDBRlY9OFI7wBWsoaiuPS+zWx dxtmq8S29fSc/f9DyL8zx02+RTMbP3pbw9tC+nCecVjkoJSpCukkdYXXEfzuG0c9WU1jAON 9oNIdlhaTpmsXYM/dppTcvYd33oGKa6utfM9DJNMxWhIoyJwH0E37kWAckPVsEg5cYeriwa 0iBJb9cSWdvZeq1gXB+gg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:rBN6SuXoMBQ=:UcZW60+jiRGT6aFlrQbFL3 akwXEz5WrlyArKXCbLqj3F5qX011gyOjQXJNXiwmyi67aJ2Uvlsdx2Mb6F1Lx0BZFYI+bGzQc 0SJ91HIBEaEkLi/yNLEpwn9aaIdxTf8KJd+29RxVPTUwIrnQqROZsj5HEyWlsapysGqhmG7hU OFUHuvxiaDm502EQjaUqbXk2o8FGcLCrUowEQoz5Ygq/wAOjYn1cfHi+7haDhHK3WKgvyiC5g +h+YpHRgKk1IaFkc5T/t5oGQOCvX1ES9G4max0/wMl6ICCpq6Rk7LpxNCeLgMf0hPYe8EZ8n2 c++/r7lJ16s1vShl0ly71xiTH3aDY/aubdTxIErJ803WJcb8bmvQdBOzuxHlNOtiIZiZXx8DV 0hYUeEyDmYYwaGooC6XgrRKAXRIpCBYtdOWQnVT+9CSBQGbJ4YWUwBqEEZNnPSxI30C0CdGwH l6NWjUTcGz2U7ZCq7o6OfkUX0j/eyeA28h7iqDkkBqcJyLAyfrNhBMY4cGVD4wUPtArduYksl T3lqBG+TBYDf7OJ6iW2HwEIu/6E9u5lygclPcIIwByq2qWYMTK1gYBKKpnMPDjZayrIVNy/5U fnitesPReSlCtcMJuMJGUTqtjuGqB6odixOt3H5HjQNm//nuyraU6i0PMIg8oc8/WBFzpcIkc HxjimD/xWQlj4B+TOoRAQHbygEfUAJqGdn3Qax0GVMa6cxAMRpmvW9Ye7Z0BH3BAKJB3Y94X7 u6VI8k/xGh03KUYCkIL/yMQycDN5t0zzfh9jDABLpebWJ0R/RBMvQxRLOM3USFAcCHlH9cVt7 ZOAVIkcaAMQTN83bBZ/BRDhCICsylQ7k+v+n+aIY1yspi1cFXXn7GipXhME5PX3liKICDiXoF XswH3LClSxTpU3Jf55eGfbSLIVZeKCmb/QvzXLF86rDcLIwwxtyLGVqjgg1iaHOulCmjry2fE MHpF/SiL5ZmdXNEmh2+dNWY6XKx9VFvnjx4EoI2wXAYOBsSXRENThvFTZpkcd9rnOINozGybI Rq08DvfgTwJK2k/mRTDXFZqOu5M+MQsHZUUBI7VfnpUYIDu5mZNdqWYQEeB6eQuFZdy7dfpJU /IbMxXjL7ksAQnDGqDJSeig7ZdVfWU4uW6maOVYI+pxR9WjTHKztBibjlZ2AGbIzK9ulZQQFp AYzqZMDjpb6h10SPSzDhBZct5zlGMGIFfrbXDPL6hoe6NrEipSJsoXjheYG7LonEo9FpUGWqI K4VEQTRo6k58Cy/3EARqHyEDtClWEfbvPzRtHbyW+97ZsdDPDTzSPfn4kQFU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/a5VIJb3CcGktkVfiq0dTd7FonGI>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [xml2rfc] [Rfc-markdown] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 05:59:19 -0000

On 08.10.2019 23:28, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> ...
>> I agree with Julian: putting <br> in a title for various reasons can
>> cause various bad side-effects.
>
> Yes, well, there's a need here.  I tried to say that already a year ago.
> ...

A need for something, yes. A need for a fixed line break, maybe not. It
would be great if somebody could actually answer my question, repeated
below:

--- snip ---

That may be true; but then, it would be awesome to understand whether
this was about:

   1. *not* breaking the title in a specific place when the title was
too long, or

   2. breaking the title because it really consists of two different parts.

For case 1) I think the "old" approach of just using &nbsp; between
words not to be broken apart is better. For 2) I'll claim that <br/> is
not the right thing to do; <subtitle> might be a better fit.

--- snip ---

Best regards, Julian