Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 29.10.2019 07:16, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2019, at 06:50, Julian Reschke <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> On 22.10.2019 18:59, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> On 18.10.2019 19:55, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/19 10:33 AM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>>>>> I don’t think we'll need <br> in titles; it's sufficient to have wj,
>>>>> nbsp, and nbhy.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. Do you feel the same about <name>, which has similar semantics?
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> I would think so (/me not Sandy, though).
>>>
>>> Anyway, I think we *do* have consensus about introducing <br> in certain
>>> places where prose is allowed. It would be good to implement that so
>>> that the spec(s?) that is in AUTH48 can move forward.
>>>
>>> We can always revisit this and add <br> in more places when the need
>>> comes up, and we have looked at alternatives.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>> No feedback? One more week has passed, and this really looks like
>> something that should have top priority…
>
> Feedback from whom?
> I didn’t reply to your summary because I thought we had a conclusion.
> ...

Well, either the RSE, the production center, or Henrik...

Best regards, Julian