Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 22 October 2019 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1144012008C for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LahO_4RU8fSG for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2AD1200C4 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1571763920; bh=LiMtjs0niIrtydfUWAfrSecPkT5zMKV5lxcxS1K0e7E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=H8KjCdypsUj8QrTfw3wXUsreLL5psZ7lxkURuhekWCGCHTWMEomqMEZBFf2ZADHqu 39p5vh3N0mUIwKQZCb1fA49QtyGwoiGN3KbqCfF6UkZvGJIr6yjCCQBZ4B8ugvl6IO ACQhYrjajrmOSqelKpVnv3tbWyE/go7kiDwvWZ30=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([217.251.130.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MkYXs-1hbDoW06py-00m7WB; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:59:34 +0200
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
References: <E1iGMu9-00055y-Ui@durif.tools.ietf.org> <de4feaff-8f71-cd38-545c-2d848749251b@levkowetz.com> <f00a671a-6fe4-f5ae-2582-0b78ffa1c256@gmx.de> <1f18382c-d830-b887-f5d3-3f376ae4fdd7@gmx.de> <B15F7AF0-F5A0-401A-9F6E-F7E0E466B6A7@amsl.com> <f4f1b7ba-127a-fbfa-531b-eeff03814281@gmx.de> <71bc8d39-d06c-d900-cc8e-04a48218d75f@gmail.com> <0905DADC-E9D5-47A7-B610-F8A62686D2BD@att.com> <07DBAE10-D1FA-45C4-B7A2-321B265CA302@amsl.com> <694c9244-98ae-1e64-39ef-8756d48b36ef@gmx.de> <860c663b-744f-a033-cc50-96088bb1b33c@gmx.de> <04DCBCE3-2C8C-4B03-9081-EF2B7A5C6087@tzi.org> <b096e29c-02a0-e009-621e-c1eca4712226@levkowetz.com> <4321EEBF-92C2-4405-81BD-899C0FCAC762@tzi.org> <5593c2d9-0bb4-93e9-f5d0-babf194340bf@levkowetz.com> <6BF7D165-EA48-44C1-9153-3F011058561F@tzi.org> <7088451e-745b-a31b-88fb-bce9cb48696a@levkowetz.com> <efb58534-8112-2303-1967-536daae9ff51@gmx.de> <34FFD9FB-7D0A-4BEE-9BAD-AFBD7F883CE6@amsl.com> <d53ef90e-5a50-1472-a61e-12c7a417ac44@icann.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <b19cd7de-6992-a3b5-ea23-929627018cc0@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:59:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d53ef90e-5a50-1472-a61e-12c7a417ac44@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lpB/IOTM8Zj85zGXpAkwT8v9RKGQIm0IQibVp3udmdlcSjfHUDx 5OcZoHPLFm5CmZTGZrFiIqEF4TRHcGRtvdeFwZBTQ2wSdnXijTUxpREEHmghh9n3wLG4H7g N7ZcEKjLGmOyzLvj8wJJjcIDywbOpheDSDZtzVq8TZLHWyPtIN8rXiG/MuHMGlc5OfsKxrr dFMBD6bUj0jipS12U2zOg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OYHBxPaVB/8=:IqI4ERlx9TGyHokdORCTYW HS7cEDR0oB3KnDyoho+CEqjG2QNbmWeT9RCoNzqlIs/GGhyPUGMGdnHJhlwIy3YWkx8O3cfpH 6YDIhNAd4qKuwE6LZ85qV2EuzBNojfCiELBxQFE8OyizPPxjSOr+efIH3CmxYhVIRS9FBLQ1f qd7VuBrG3+hb2Fptf14BAk7q3iI0nK5f2oWZXjJUtZIuhY0jo7yi3se31RQiT1P1NQ3vGCmcw la1AFQQrGXFlGg2RQEGTzIePFMk5X1canEtWkFHcxOdUF8wckfOT9eg6xna08nUrVdrTi74mi HfC8bJO0E4/bHB+X9itSECiNkq5t9SlRU1ihRZS96EoBc0a9bMvRcdWevKqz7BYoQsPm98aCn HEPJMvzC/OIpmbqkkKenEHyaHziKULmYZdXIGsk36SW2PNDEIk7d7cSXMXnGCzigwaW4XwERB 08AbJI397XllbNFND+Q8TeAYD0TKoTjMuRtGuWeU2emr5wJCAQmLAMfU/T5koGskRJFsgjrXC xYlfy2zbWIN2SNx+IeH1QEOv585R1YaX0GHCcLfOYgy7qC9wCgwff5iHVD8dJ9Eenwg6slEZv RVnlEezYMslrgRnbdCbMrt6PN7qAiBKbozt9Cf0vzdBpald9Vglcf54FkzjKDFwsIrMsh+OLm A8tycIi7kVjIBwZOA8iVAHCofudP1NWEh/BF8OI9YiT7bq8703t2mnlJB17agwJlNR3qkZK/5 dG/+BLlYaYcw/r0SdeyEsI7Vw5v5D9tdYnqhBE4sICLw4a2PyFF+hUeItETMq7JWWp8gubuzu Wsk+kAtLS57xVBS2YaHMXZXE7tdn9vTB+GmdCHWVtXhPPMvRvmdlokBwbVabFa7XkDxVdx8b+ Vuo1XM+mhGdbO34d63uaPhWm44vh7dhx+bUgSLsxmuzX9SuprUX29ALL363C4ocVvAuSlMJ3t 2e+sqCAGsq19hV8qvgHawyHhUGzp09q+grYMLIHd8OIGKL1QtF7MEnAIiIMGaGSrEjR0QiwSu QjN1kwmbHNrkWSPEu4NNDZZjvD9dedd+BndjrmZgDuNb7UzjeWzkgKwiNz6lk1Zjw32aQ69S8 +C02B5y4hr2+Dcooe33RNRgpetx7i4a7rn/w+0PSI2oN4lmlZrVPvc/nsITG4nCl8L6u3dtAP fhtz1Jst0gcDUx369lpEyQTz3QJaeFvxB9WKOhH3rjJLIZ4GXv2yikT+J/LXo2PAq8SwQ3EuF ITmv0ay1ZSMpC28QnXW/h6VYsBMZs3/k5zPbSYyXjSQ70cLE1guS5A10DV2M=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/tXS4mMJOptJJxGX3UxX1ONW67hw>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:05:26 -0000

On 18.10.2019 19:55, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 10/18/19 10:33 AM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>> I don’t think we'll need <br> in titles; it's sufficient to have wj, nbsp, and nbhy.
>
> Thanks. Do you feel the same about <name>, which has similar semantics?
> ...

I would think so (/me not Sandy, though).

Anyway, I think we *do* have consensus about introducing <br> in certain
places where prose is allowed. It would be good to implement that so
that the spec(s?) that is in AUTH48 can move forward.

We can always revisit this and add <br> in more places when the need
comes up, and we have looked at alternatives.

Best regards, Julian