Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Perkins" <csp@csperkins.org>
To: "Qin Wu" <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Cc: <xrblock@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt

> On 13 Dec 2012, at 10:45, Qin Wu wrote:
>>>> Also, one question: there are many reserved values for the jb cfg. Do we need to define how new values are to be registered in an IANA Registry, or is the assumption that this draft is revised if new values are needed?
>> 
>>>> [Qin]:I am a little doubt about this. Do you have other values in mind besides the values for fixed jitter buffer method and adaptive jitter buffer method?
>>>> Also these values looks to me are just configuration parameters. They usually fixed upon they are set.
>>> 
>>> If the meaning of values not defined in this draft is unknown what use are they?
>> 
>> [Qin]: I think the problem is we don't know how many new values we need to add. The current two values we defined in the draft are used to distinct measurement results that are using different jitter buffer method. If we don't have any new value to be defined, we don't need to resort to IANA Registry, if we do have many new values that need to be defined, I think IANA Registry is the right approach.
> 
> 
> I disagree. If this is an expected extension point of the protocol, then you need an IANA registry. Otherwise, mark the bits as reserved, and let someone revise the RFC if they need to extend it.

[Qin]: Okay, I see your point.

> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock