IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 30 June 2010 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665DC3A67D0 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.675
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.675 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.924, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id noAHyOpkz8GY for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2543A695A for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1OTvNx-000Klm-2Q; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:23:21 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:23:19 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Message-ID: <DCC7247447B35776DB292E53@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4C2A69B9.3070508@att.com>
References: <4C29FEA3.8050800@piuha.net> <4C2A2814.8080007@dcrocker.net> <4C2A69B9.3070508@att.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:23:12 -0000

--On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 17:46 -0400 Tony Hansen
<tony@att.com> wrote:

> If Russ' two step process goes forward, then the YAM working
> group's current charter will be complete.

And, presumably the pre-eval documents will be permitted to
quietly expire.

> At that point, we will have some choices to make such as
> whether we shut down the WG or whether we recharter.
> 
> When we started up YAM, we did discuss several possibilities
> for post-Full Standard work, including working on the numerous
> documents sitting in Proposed Standard state.
> 
> It will be up to the WG to make a decision when the time comes.

And, presumably, whether to modify any or all of the document
that are now in the charter to recycle them, presumably in
improved form, without the (new) grade.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email