Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 27 June 2010 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A2E3A6811 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.226
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.226 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.373, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UI9hhYikY+q0 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9513A63C9 for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.2.129] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TCctcAAJfw5D@rufus.isode.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:52:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4C272D60.9000703@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:52:16 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100626145920.0b610618@elandnews.com> <6785AF47EC3ACD933037ABE5@PST.JCK.COM> <6.2.5.6.2.20100626173821.0b374a90@resistor.net> <4C2725DA.6000507@isode.com> <4C272C75.8060407@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C272C75.8060407@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:52:25 -0000

Dave CROCKER wrote:

> On 6/27/2010 11:20 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>>                        are people still going
>> to be interested in updating various email specs if 3 muturity levels
>> are replaced with 1 or 2?
>> (I understand that that would mean rechartering, but that is a
>> relatively minor point.)
>
> That will probably depend upon wht the 2 levels re.
>
> If the proposal being promoted by Russ is chosen, then there's nothing 
> for this wg to do:  everything that is a candidate for the wg should 
> automatically already be at the final level.  No?

Dave,
This is not the question I've asked ;-). "Are people interested in 
updating documents" and "are people interested in moving from Draft to 
Full" are not quite the same.