Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322

[Tony Hansen <[e-mail]>]

I would call this an excellent agenda item for Maastricht.

Some of the documents are quite needy of a rev, irrespective of Russ' 
document's outcome. Deciding on the set of documents that make up that 
list would be one of the tasks for the WG. One of the interesting thing 
about using the pre-evaluation step is that we've forced people to think 
through the state of the documents and to get buy-in from the WG for 
those changes. None of the pre-eval docs so far have been contentious, 
but future ones may be more so.

     Tony

On 6/27/2010 6:20 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> [Moving this discussion to YAM and changing the subject.]
>
> I have a more fundamental question for this WG: are people still going 
> to be interested in updating various email specs if 3 muturity levels 
> are replaced with 1 or 2?
> (I understand that that would mean rechartering, but that is a 
> relatively minor point.)