Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Karen Moore
2022-12-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/U6wP1EIsJ1GYy2sLCrHy_u-idDk/
3257747
2043325
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)
2022-12-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/hcvPTMHdX352X228HPoFgqGbd78/
3257577
2043325
[auth48] R: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review[auth48] R: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Mauro Cociglio
2022-12-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/209G7uiTwkFMhjLucYkLXT0gefQ/
3257575
2043325
[auth48] 答复: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review[auth48] 答复: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
qinfengwei
2022-12-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ZEE3tJnqjCPhsle9wVtx4y8QWgU/
3257515
2043325
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Tianran Zhou
2022-12-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/MKpo3rWnY8sPEwyTtiMNqZoCYHU/
3257494
2043325
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Karen Moore
2022-12-13
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/vV5WDwe9eISMNPjdcJE866j10OA/
3257477
2043325
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-12-13
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/tAwMcpyr0l8zdiR4MtaOoJHHtu0/
3257384
2043325
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9343 <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-17> for your review
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-12-13
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/NhNhvIJ21wiEbH6Espsw8fDDig4/
3257249
2043325
Re: [ippm] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [ippm] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-07-12
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/PakhLJQUWxZRo3L0wyCb5C9m08E/
3199607
2020674
Re: [ippm] IDR adoption of draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-cpabilities-05.txt - Request for input (6/24 to 7/8/2022)Re: [ippm] IDR adoption of draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-cpabilities-05.txt - Request for input (6/24 to 7/8/2022)
Susan Hares
2022-07-11
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/vjDVWHx_ReEe7TKUvz3TKdSt_Ig/
3198857
2017395
Re: [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bisRe: [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-07-06
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/q3QiUvF2R4yS46nsfZlBCvgssIc/
3196571
2018974
RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-06-29
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/ydSHVkggoSQGUvykxo-D39X-G_c/
3193881
2017538
RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-06-28
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/4ow8QZXrDxcZsdeP8Ml6YS1GSYc/
3193465
2017538
Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
John Scudder
2022-06-27
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/8-Z5oIlRDfwyV0WHR122PN3Cm7Y/
3193273
2017538
RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-06-27
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/gbduWbRFxkr06z1rxU6UgtXav9E/
3193221
2017538
Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
John Scudder
2022-06-26
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/72mDEVbO2Qp0UuIUEMNnXI6HyhM/
3192786
2017538
Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Bob Hinden
2022-06-26
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/JMTFKsACCwexVHDr01rfYUJMjlQ/
3192782
2017538
John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
John Scudder via Datatracker
2022-06-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/bAVgwZCOb9UTixJ2DKL-MDXkcdI/
3192726
2017538
Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bisRe: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-04-22
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/_quPJawrZ4qQWD6qyweNtQlys-Q/
3173017
2007168
Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bisRe: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
xiao.min2
2022-04-22
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/M9b-vB9OqlYLCS7iNKX07ReiVi0/
3173005
2007168
Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bisRe: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-04-22
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/RChQTIPPTMwKWPzVwPXCiByiOWI/
3172998
2007168
Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bisRe: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
xiao.min2
2022-04-22
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/pmWm1snlHdGfXJYtTNEq23Gbk5k/
3172983
2007168
Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bisRe: [ippm] WG adoption call for RFC8321bis and 8889bis
Giuseppe Fioccola
2022-04-21
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/ck5RKsx-_Mhour4vRkmIDG4DcU8/
3172649
2007168
Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)
Haoyu Song
2021-11-29
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/Rnf9wPBW4QtQmu1gfoF89DFINBA/
3099437
1982020
[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)
Lars Eggert via Datatracker
2021-11-29
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/W8UAuEdv8ZCaL_x9EgBwxe0Tq2w/
3099220
1982020
Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Haoyu Song
2021-11-19
rtg-dir
None
/arch/msg/rtg-dir/MnNucPEAm7CgDm3qqz2uZJUF5Go/
3096990
1981030
Re: [OPSAWG] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10Re: [OPSAWG] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Haoyu Song
2021-11-19
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/1fUekeRwvnsWINi5ppYxqUor49w/
3096991
1981029
Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Haoyu Song
2021-11-19
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/72VtjkexdiRQwdATbVhydKcJLlA/
3096992
1981028
Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)Re: [OPSAWG] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)
Haoyu Song
2021-11-19
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/nYZnd-Jced2ofZVWpMc7j4_PwIQ/
3096903
1980998
[Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10[Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Dhruv Dhody
2021-11-19
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/8GTf52cY3rNmDFrnM6DEdUaWwyM/
3096808
1981028
[OPSAWG] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10[OPSAWG] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Dhruv Dhody
2021-11-19
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/je_-MLFYVA3HB8eIyKtRZgdEkEo/
3096809
1981029
[RTG-DIR] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10[RTG-DIR] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10
Dhruv Dhody
2021-11-19
rtg-dir
None
/arch/msg/rtg-dir/SfFCrlGpZf6HsqU20Pz1If1aMrU/
3096810
1981030
[OPSAWG] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)[OPSAWG] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker
2021-11-19
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/bgMUluSWOSQ6fw7--akyFGckeVE/
3096729
1980998
[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2][OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07 [2]
Rob Wilton (rwilton)
2021-10-06
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/WDnVtM_vLm15X28OTEwI9Q6gfx0/
3080445
1974207
[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-07
Rob Wilton (rwilton)
2021-10-06
opsawg
None
/arch/msg/opsawg/7HR0bbR9EEerW17IZrtVhNT5e1M/
3080443
1974206
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed StandardRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed Standard
Giuseppe Fioccola
2021-08-31
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/0uZ9a6uQtC2s7Ve8cQ6Vm-tInkk/
3069410
1969514
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed StandardRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed Standard
Barry Leiba
2021-08-30
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/RSyH0qpUhEhTtKVPgG_nBYJ93uw/
3069243
1969514
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed StandardRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed Standard
Giuseppe Fioccola
2021-08-30
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/kPc48I10Z56_D9FEm1iGTFOQQB0/
3069220
1969514
Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document StatusRe: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status
gregory.mirsky
2021-07-28
bier
None
/arch/msg/bier/5zk9w25pFCOVs-27CQ7SZYY4vMs/
3058253
1964950
Re: [ippm] Comparing Alternate Marking and Explicit Flow Measurements (Spin bit, ...)Re: [ippm] Comparing Alternate Marking and Explicit Flow Measurements (Spin bit, ...)
Lubashev, Igor
2021-03-30
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/D_-RUDutBi1PSJF1-PUAFssEjzk/
3015923
1944365