Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-15
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/t3D0dNa5e_h6HsdDsvEX8IohoGs/
2768999
1853845
[dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd[dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-08-14
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ESSp7DJ_Ij0tCzAvJws-b4lLurg/
2768566
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Dotzero
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/liZhViZrOuneiMSS9DmSt5Z-6mE/
2767778
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txtRe: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5l3R0dQ5DWxSyYIoQyHuNHNmP8w/
2767756
1853516
[dmarc-ietf] Purposes of aggregate and per message failure Reports[dmarc-ietf] Purposes of aggregate and per message failure Reports
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nQQ4dhxSe-kmmImr7cFKSplvl9E/
2767747
1853525
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VtUn_1W1WD_kfX3ESNXokby6eJY/
2767742
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txtRe: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UPJ2QTmkaJbtXuxuTVLSAOZU3Fg/
2767736
1853516
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt
internet-drafts
2019-08-10
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/doz29c4cjdf8JPCCm_HTHu5BR7k/
2767733
1853516
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Marc Bradshaw
2019-08-09
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TfSS8IiLmjfMl9m_spN58HThOr4/
2767332
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Stan Kalisch
2019-08-09
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/e_6CF-kEbAMEvVIU692nBlfaIUw/
2767299
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/U_-2zIDXoRfitHARyIMrOJ_SXbA/
2767084
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iIWb9WLtMN_T1v0T1A2_CJ76OMo/
2766943
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/44PkBeewjVq2fmxXjh7UV0ZENvo/
2766930
1852212
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1stOw4kA7Za1JFSc3ekiWZ9t5CE/
2766913
1853065
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rfwrh4Ms6W7PPODBcTtW_ZCl9cs/
2766904
1852212
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_wy0bozmtMugrSI6jDLEA8Dfz3I/
2766893
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Seth Blank
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/a-_nTBdcL7k2p-gB7PmMPSion8s/
2766628
1850799
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/A1d-TnZCYbOG1Iuvcl0sUn48uqM/
2766366
1853065
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6YgeMiY8HKXaQF04Apm-s9Z6dQk/
2766332
1852212
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kkjXLR_16NGaxd5aF9_Obt_HjaA/
2766317
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MkmJDjEbY5CLOmTUXEvcWPAx-kQ/
2766310
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OSxo48mfoxpXzcqC6A7GmXId-64/
2766309
1852619
[dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs[dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7QmWbMMEp-TpkjGmDg0wvzhtDuQ/
2766251
1853065
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Je8aG2PpkzFoGSnE80eO12EvdXI/
2765971
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistenciesRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bfc2UAJ7LfWRgdykTlm4E6_87Ew/
2765968
1852189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
John Levine
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3Ok2bQC6Dy_MmELD-unBZaQQZgg/
2765893
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistenciesRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8kD52Ie8yWxxaaEsXPOG2as_caQ/
2765817
1852189
[dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?[dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ql4WHQ_lbTZ3-ZziXEm_yBBgaKY/
2765711
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/PcG3AjeBbs20RuY5ugg-tkvteMQ/
2765003
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QUBbzhLI2-b0nOumycBZ54_Neoo/
2765000
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NzUuezzcP54-a_Qq0d0F0khuyqM/
2764999
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T-69NZcpF1YAdw22YV75MLrlxQc/
2764995
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kCYWj6m7zEJGG54bh8JXFJArHag/
2764994
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Steve Atkins
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/M8EIMhJdDrq2wy-UdRbFMEVNGtY/
2764988
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oe1VSCjyYEu44Ct_UVsQITVdNS4/
2764985
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Steve Atkins
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ALsYBzgJFOF1bFT3EjlK7lpFdj4/
2764984
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do we need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do we need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uK4or4Kphi7FYkQl7zExaJbeAVI/
2764903
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kiyBI3bqX7CQtOT5A1Aq_Dg8MZM/
2764902
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Jeremy Harris
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T7dRjR65wnGRC529SapH8kBe8lg/
2764901
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nli31UHaq6CR3Grk0eAsbaRX7P8/
2764898
1843355
6234 Messages