Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Richard Patterson
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UdjuDC-rqHjoP9shoybFih_3NVs/
2698686
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Owen DeLong
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/31B2XVE1v1_arEUU0Ua_hROyqXA/
2698623
1825007
Re: Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)Re: Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Xn7IJG-2dNEvK2hSVCvb40POkns/
2698514
1828193
Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)
Ole Troan
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_JNCEDlPwHM0hNXlbRBaAYCYQvI/
2698484
1828193
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/k74SQ7QT1gx63XrqwUBDF7rIv2s/
2698474
1828193
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/EIVv9WcYhrG9CUpdvXsG1gK4RAQ/
2698442
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0rUHv7YTx1yetMGQC3duk5o0-ks/
2698406
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Mark Smith
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/pS9KHySXPY9nj4MOxJ5gQz9wa3M/
2698345
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Brian E Carpenter
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/mloZ0_2yVAUwamQf_2njxKlyhx8/
2698324
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Philip Homburg
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HiVAmCUkGbmpWVBXiNfW6zC9O7A/
2698313
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Mark Smith
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/AM3UEgq4akGid4SI7M_6gUwNOh8/
2698283
1825007
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Bob Hinden
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vJShLhDVDKuGM4EomzGDexNL29g/
2698276
1828193
6MAN - IETF104 Call for agenda items6MAN - IETF104 Call for agenda items
Bob Hinden
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CgE-cyc0TSGrmMfqACxjgq83rts/
2698274
1828874
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Erik Kline
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/5PdFaGY7w8u6ulmoqwhWNvDzSG8/
2698233
1825007
there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Brian E Carpenter
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0ODf86ZMu5FV0XHyNUymneZbRAU/
2698227
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
神明達哉
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-WWqmzL6LKnjjCQGWATwtk2Ip48/
2698217
1825007
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/q0hAdPjFSAFoxpcz7fNBPUR4g-o/
2698211
1828193
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jTGuff2UZaZbfQgR9qPEHOaiHSM/
2698175
1825007
RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-I3LhcE4eRyEHAxm_H1REhxbNfw/
2698173
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
神明達哉
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aZntdzZLmYHFukt5E6bjv_XPLmw/
2698163
1825007
RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Bernie Volz (volz)
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/4opwAbQ96dqSCYR5wfzJKuj14bI/
2698159
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Behcet Sarikaya
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/2Kd-Ofbj1Psn6CLAHNNogtNesaI/
2698151
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Sander Steffann
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/fqLbFYHZ9z7X_EB8QDUn2OP-dIE/
2698148
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/V23jlnIc8-xqROU0gVFzqBfjmHA/
2698130
1825007
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/d8OB7iTwO2aLc49JaJP_jQo6kVs/
2698126
1828193
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/9gFM50rMDpVYsk-h31bLbXOMkcU/
2698124
1825007
RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/KFiTtDDQ96-T81snwKyvDcakmkk/
2698119
1825007
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aTPVxayg0hr_SEdvOG18jYZdY4Q/
2698100
1828193
RE: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRE: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Bernie Volz (volz)
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/VN1Pfw8iUw0p5KOoAdaD_uyqliM/
2698095
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/E6hWKWUtv3W3I8AYtgZohZHkxPw/
2698061
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/rO-u87RPivfwE5lPBrJc5Xeg72M/
2698057
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/wAB281w6t3U7Ou4bXza0PJix6Ik/
2698055
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Bernie Volz (volz)
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/zE_m6BFzFoLGnaUop8pxarcEIfU/
2698050
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ook9wkOPVsmmDYaKvkeK-mtCoLo/
2698042
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3TGDAYCRqqT8--Oa160i6pNrXHg/
2698039
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/FU213MuZp1ERDUA09BDxSAZbrbI/
2698036
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Michael Richardson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8T3AqlRZKX8L1Y6GsmM31V3aqL4/
2698031
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Richard Patterson
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/QFfU2WcOdEvscDzIUFX1pGLe5SM/
2697997
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Mark Smith
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xE5q9s66fGofs4FFFx3MSvCIexs/
2697994
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/dGYnRGh_aF4tDYQUOhxVYvOvtWc/
2697991
1825007