Subject
From
Date
List
[jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?[jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Karen O'Donoghue
2013-04-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/tbcOdnwJLDnZ8EGZNJ9dV2ichh0/
820126
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Dick Hardt
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/3t2MN23jsVTjdZtpXA63FtJs1AM/
820131
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Manger, James H
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/eIEUsb0cy8n5Zevq63wzjg0k9Co/
820134
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Matt Miller
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/CA4pH3-9IbYWVrJ7t-gzEGkRO4U/
820184
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Axel.Nennker
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/8IskbJ-iVxmF6dIdg1tT623HTUE/
820139
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Roland Hedberg
2013-04-13
jose
/arch/msg/jose/HMvhxWv6DmZ1pD9Fc_0ExLCiILk/
820144
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Mike Jones
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-41G2B7pM07UjNTmEaEWGEmjSzk/
820159
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
nov matake
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KFQHrbsfkWqohvq7jMJrbtC_mVs/
820171
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Anthony Nadalin
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/9fLscj6QFQgrMRnD00gmPN37TWk/
820179
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Matias Woloski
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/vE1BLrpGKe4b8Es5Yxu8QjfPjuA/
820183
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Manger, James H
2013-04-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/wnxe3pYhyGAYWxecmZhrTonK2GY/
820226
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Salvatore D'Agostino
2013-04-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Aj1Yjr0eFP3jhAHJZK_gyf37aps/
820258
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
hideki nara
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/HnUF8e-9WZP4jm9hzgrdoDZO76g/
820154
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ngrM8269xTTQWhM6X5LJHBtmoD4/
820196
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
John Bradley
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/iLjIA_rAwRGdhtkaBd4dyT1rn8Y/
820202
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/jyD10mWfroVpn2Kut-WG8u6PjMM/
820207
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Russ Housley
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/_S26f4S5mubSIv8LYVWqRotfxbk/
820213
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
John Bradley
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JWeEdo_vu3M5zWcD8QhCKxxaNwQ/
820220
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/HI9n4cbx4hxadbuglAsA-F-E7MM/
820230
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/9mjpqpRIWDX1ZPwkPr4fBTZIBtc/
820216
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/NSEsybpxyeqzy-culHgCHyRpYNs/
820238
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Peck, Michael A
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/LA8QKz6ol0W62N8626ejJNMJqyk/
820251
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Russ Housley
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KG7F-Hg1YwbOHkOHwWBTAhwBwkc/
820253
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/rG_1yzgNaPCfjYQ2GEmk9ihQxl0/
820255
1445377
[jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?[jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Karen O'Donoghue
2013-04-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/p70U54FRI5LDE4GyPdHOp4EC848/
820125
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Dick Hardt
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nwv1Umc7RK3KmlWQLU-eaC0Dd-w/
820130
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Axel.Nennker
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/S4pE_QkDe4kJXHcaBTSVkBoobSc/
820138
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Manger, James H
2013-04-12
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Gha85RJp4EvzTeGStXH99Ae5xCo/
820133
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Roland Hedberg
2013-04-14
jose
/arch/msg/jose/vAzw5D9Pq9OAxtrhO0qweh0VrQc/
820148
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Mike Jones
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/2g7x59ovHrK4qBemK-vmRKREEPI/
820158
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
nov matake
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/GD109e2TBK5kVAHiXFBDcrOyniY/
820170
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Matias Woloski
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/gXb_fXJ5KHdILBMgsCxawZYjcR8/
820175
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Anthony Nadalin
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/v4_Ao2URZrh_4g2MlrdfwJVVuhw/
820180
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
hideki nara
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/4BXZUS2VPPpKo5fs2fixa38ld5s/
820151
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/LSEtgXEc4ptuCPqEGvX5XRhqnvY/
820189
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Mike Jones
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/K7_XXV4Lo_6HgiIxjxFoHXrc2JI/
820191
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/E-nquYrpBR4FZkRXNNwLvmy1Zfo/
820200
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/6AwHwJwbtugf7gKJtFkbYPGfe8o/
820195
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/oHffsJwAqUBrjbZrIxkSH2fCuT8/
820217
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/iiXFSRpmnVOov4Gm3n-ZFWXK_io/
820231
1445378